FBI probes trading as KPMG quits Herbalife, Skechers audits

Tue Apr 9, 2013 7:10pm EDT

Traders work at the post that trades Herbalife stock on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange in this January 10, 2013 file photograph. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/Files

Traders work at the post that trades Herbalife stock on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange in this January 10, 2013 file photograph.

Credit: Reuters/Brendan McDermid/Files

(Reuters) - In a blow to one of the world's largest accounting firms, KPMG said it resigned as auditor of two U.S. corporations amid an FBI investigation into insider trading allegations involving leaked information and a former senior partner.

The two California-based companies - nutritional products group Herbalife Ltd and footwear maker Skechers USA Inc - said separately on Tuesday that KPMG had quit as their auditor in connection with the leaks.

The FBI's Los Angeles office is investigating the matter, according to a source familiar with the situation.

Skechers Chief Financial Officer David Weinberg told Reuters in an interview that Scott London had been the lead auditor for Skechers and had resigned after the leaks. Weinberg said that London had admitted to sharing inside information.

A KPMG spokesman confirmed that London was the partner who had resigned from the firm.

London was not immediately available for comment. The 50-year-old California native worked at KPMG for 29 years. A baseball lover, London became chairman of the L.A. Sports Council in 2011. He is also listed as a 2012 director on the board of the Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce.

Shares of Herbalife closed down 3.8 percent at $36.95, while Skechers shares were up 1.9 percent at $21.91 on Tuesday on moderately bullish New York Stock Exchange trading.


"This is and will be disruptive to the stock, but hopefully not the company," said Timothy Ramey, an analyst at investment services firm D.A. Davidson & Co. in a report on Herbalife.

Ramey downgraded Herbalife shares to "neutral" from "buy."

Herbalife said in a statement that KPMG's resignation had nothing to do with the company's accounting practices or the integrity of its management - issues called into question by the high-stakes drama between hedge fund titans Bill Ackman and Carl Icahn over the company.

KPMG said in a statement late on Monday that it had resigned as the outside auditor for two clients due to the actions of a senior partner, who was in charge of the audit practice in its Los Angeles business unit.

Monday's announcement did not identify the partner or the companies involved. It said the unidentified partner provided inside information about its clients to someone who had used that information in stock trading.

"The partner was immediately separated from the firm," KPMG said in its statement. "This individual violated the firm's rigorous policies and protections, betrayed the trust of clients as well as colleagues, and acted with deliberate disregard for KPMG's long-standing culture of professionalism and integrity."


When the KPMG resignations became known late on Monday, the identity of the senior partner involved was initially unknown. London's name did not emerge until late on Tuesday.

The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), which polices audit firms, proposed in 2011 that the firms be required to disclose the names of individual engagement partners in audit reports, as they must in some other countries.

That proposal has not been made a U.S. rule. Some audit critics said it should be to make auditing more transparent, though audit firms have resisted this idea for a variety of reasons.

A PCAOB spokeswoman declined to comment.

KPMG is the smallest of the Big Four global accounting and audit firms. It reported 2012 revenue of $23 billion, up 1.4 percent from the year before.

The other three firms are PricewaterhouseCoopers, Deloitte and Ernst & Young. All are U.S.-based and operate affiliate networks around the world.

Ackman and Icahn were not immediately available for comment.

Any controversy over KPMG's dealings could hurt the firm's reputation. In 2005, KPMG narrowly avoided a criminal indictment by agreeing to pay $456 million in a deferred prosecution settlement with U.S. authorities over its sale of tax shelters. Three years earlier, smaller rival Arthur Andersen collapsed over its auditing work for energy company Enron Corp.

In addition, KPMG partners were the only ones so far to have been sued by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the global financial crisis.

(Additional reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York,; Ben Berkowitz in Boston, Sarah N. Lynch in Washington; and Nanette Byrnes in Chapel Hill, North Carolina; Writing by Kevin Drawbaugh; Editing by Gerald E. McCormick, Matthew Lewis and Lisa Shumaker)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
Thucydides wrote:
The only thing really surprising here, is that anyone would actually listen to, or pay any attention to this auditor’s “information.” After all, weren’t these big 4 accounting firms the same ones that time and again over the past 13 years, demonstrated virtually no ability to find their butts with both hands when it comes to actually reading the financials of a large corporation. After Enron and Worldcom, not to mention the financial collapse of 2008, why on earth would anyone listen to the word of a big 4 auditor? It’s laughable all the way around.

Apr 09, 2013 1:53pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
dtschuck wrote:
Why in the world would they rat out companies that are paying them tens of millions in fees, if ratting them out would cause them to lose the work….ain’t gonna happen.

The same as the rating agencies, Suck ‘em and Pork ‘em (S&P) and Moody’s. We have such a awful financial system with so many inherent conflicts that sometimes one dispairs of there being a single honest person on Wall Street.

Apr 09, 2013 2:37pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
ahmiles wrote:
Follow the money and you see why no one goes to jail….

Apr 09, 2013 3:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.