Penney ex-CEO Johnson losing a fortune on his failed experiment

Tue Apr 9, 2013 6:18pm EDT

J.C. Penney Chief Executive Ron Johnson testifies in New York state Supreme Court in Manhattan March 1, 2013. REUTERS/Thomas Iannaccone/Pool

J.C. Penney Chief Executive Ron Johnson testifies in New York state Supreme Court in Manhattan March 1, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Thomas Iannaccone/Pool

(Reuters) - Few investors are taking as big a hit from J.C. Penney Co Inc's (JCP.N) failed turnaround experiment as the man who engineered it: recently ousted Chief Executive Ron Johnson.

Johnson is out at least $37.6 million so far, excluding his salary and fringe benefits, according to regulatory filings reviewed by compensation consultants Equilar.

Johnson, who incorrectly bet Penney shoppers would take to his no-coupons, no-discounts strategy, put in $50 million of his own money to buy 7.26 million warrants in 2011. That gave him the right to buy shares at $29.92, a way to show investors confidence in his plan for Penney.

The only problem for Johnson is that shares, which were worth $35.37 when he bought the warrants, fell 55 percent between then and Monday, when his ousting was announced.

Under the terms of his agreement with Penney, Johnson was not allowed to exercise the warrants unless he was terminated from his job, in which case they would be exercisable immediately.

With shares at $13.93 on Tuesday afternoon, hovering just above 12-year lows, the warrants are deep underwater and unlikely to rise to profitable levels for him any time soon.

Johnson could not be reached for comment.

The steps Johnson took to align his potential compensation with Penney's performance were uncommon, said Aaron Boyd, director of research at Equilar.

Johnson's pain is slightly dulled by the 893,000 Penney shares he still holds from a grant of 1.66 million shares the retailer gave him in 2011, compensation for benefits he was losing by leaving Apple Inc (AAPL.O). (He sold some in 2012 to cover tax obligations).

The remaining shares are worth $12.4 million, or less than half what they were worth when he got them.

(Reporting by Phil Wahba in New York; Editing by Leslie Gevirtz)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
Zaichik wrote:
Seems very appropriate to me!

Apr 09, 2013 7:07pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Zaichik wrote:
Seems perfectly appropriate to me!

Apr 09, 2013 7:07pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
matchless wrote:
Arrogance? Ego? Ignorance? Sure all of these and
then some. History repeats itself. Enron rises again.

Apr 09, 2013 7:14pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.