Alabama governor signs law tightening rules for abortion clinics

BIRMINGHAM, Alabama Tue Apr 9, 2013 1:31pm EDT

Alabama Governor Robert Bentley speaks during a news conference in Mobile, Alabama July 2, 2012. European planemaker Airbus held a news conference to announce that they will construct an assembly plant for their A320 in Mobile. REUTERS/Jonathan Bachman

Alabama Governor Robert Bentley speaks during a news conference in Mobile, Alabama July 2, 2012. European planemaker Airbus held a news conference to announce that they will construct an assembly plant for their A320 in Mobile.

Credit: Reuters/Jonathan Bachman

Related Topics

BIRMINGHAM, Alabama (Reuters) - Doctors who provide abortions will face stricter standards in Alabama starting in July under a law signed on Tuesday that requires them to have admitting privileges at hospitals in the state.

Proponents say the legislation, the latest salvo in the national debate over abortion, will make pregnancy terminations safer, while critics say it will unnecessarily restrict a woman's right under the U.S. Constitution to choose an abortion.

The Alabama bill was passed last week by state lawmakers and signed by Republican Governor Robert Bentley, a former dermatologist.

"As a physician, and as a governor, I am proud to sign this legislation," Bentley said in a statement. "This bill provides appropriate standards of care. It has been endorsed by pro-life groups across Alabama."

Most Alabama clinics hire out-of-town physicians to provide abortions and partner with local doctors who have hospital admitting privileges to provide follow-up care.

Alabama is the seventh state to require hospital admitting privileges for abortion providers, according to Elizabeth Nash, state issues manager at the Washington-based Guttmacher Institute, which studies reproductive health.

A similar law in Mississippi is threatening to shutter that state's sole abortion clinic, which has been unable to obtain hospital privileges for its physicians.

Nash said the increased stigma and fear of reprisals associated with abortion has over time resulted in fewer providers entering the field. A lack of providers often forces clinics to look beyond their immediate cities to find doctors willing to perform abortions.

In Alabama, the state's four licensed abortion clinics will have 180 days to meet the new standards after the law takes effect on July 1. The measure also mandates the clinics to meet the same facility standards as ambulatory care centers.

As with the law in Mississippi, legal challenges are expected from advocacy groups such as Planned Parenthood.

Nikema Williams, vice president of public policy for Planned Parenthood Southeast, said it "stands ready to do whatever it takes to protect Alabamians' health and rights in the face of this dangerous law and blatant attack on women's health and rights."

Lawmakers across the country have passed new restrictions on abortion rights in recent years, including laws approved in the last month in North Dakota and Arkansas that are seen as direct challenges to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Roe v. Wade that legalized abortion in 1973.

North Dakota in late March became the first state to approve a ban on most abortions once a fetal heartbeat can be detected, about six weeks into pregnancy, and the first to ban abortions solely because of fetal genetic anomalies.

(Additional reporting and writing by Colleen Jenkins; Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Grant McCool)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
bobber1956 wrote:
It will not stop the murder but it will provide a little more protection for the health of women having abortions. That is what it is all about right-womens health?

Apr 09, 2013 3:01pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
grumpyman58 wrote:
Always interesting that the CONsevatives are always on about less government, yet they seem to always go out their way to stick their noses in where it’s not needed,usually by back door means, and doesn’t it always seem upon investigation that some legislator has some friend, relative or whatever that is in a business that will benefit and profit from such interferences. Oh well pretty typical

Apr 09, 2013 3:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
bobber1956 wrote:

Really-so who wants to take my gun and tried to get the UN to do it? Requireing Dr.s be responsible in a medical proceedure….go figure.

Apr 09, 2013 3:50pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.