NY jury awards damages to billionaire William Koch in wine fraud

NEW YORK Thu Apr 11, 2013 8:07pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A federal jury in New York on Thursday handed a legal victory to U.S. billionaire William Koch and awarded him damages in his dispute over the alleged misrepresentation of 24 bottles of wine he bought at auction, one of the attorneys said.

Koch, 72, the founder of Oxbow Group energy company, accused tech entrepreneur Eric Greenberg of knowingly selling him counterfeit bottles of wine at a 2005 Zachys auction.

Koch filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Manhattan in 2007, accusing Greenberg, the San Francisco-based founder of several Internet companies, of fraud and misrepresentation and seeking $320,000, the amount he paid for the 24 bottles.

The federal jury started deliberations on Thursday afternoon and returned early evening with its verdict that Koch should be compensated for the amount he spent on the wine, said Greenberg's attorney Arthur Shartsis.

Greenberg had denied the charges, saying any forgeries from his wine cellar got to the auction house by mistake.

Experts for both sides agreed that the wine in one of the 24 bottles is fake. The authenticity of the other 23 bottles was unclear, although expert witnesses testified that some of the labels were copies of the originals.

None of the bottles has been opened nor the wine tasted.

In closing arguments on Thursday, Shartsis told the jury his client did not knowingly sell fakes. He argued that the New York-based Zachys auction house sold the bottles "as is," meaning the buyer accepted the product in whatever condition it was at the time.

Greenberg's contract with the auction house did not require him to prove the wine was real, the attorney said.

"Eric didn't know if the bottles were fake," the attorney said afterward.

Koch's lawyer John Hueston said in court that Greenberg withheld information about the provenance and authenticity of his wine collection.

Koch, whose brother David Koch is a major supporter of conservative political causes, settled a separate lawsuit with the auction house in 2011, details of which were kept private.

(Editing by Ellen Wulfhorst and Phil Berlowitz)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (13)
DavidRoz wrote:
It’s unbelievable to read this as a major news item. So many Americans are still struggling and people around the world are dying hungry and cold every day, and here are two guys who are trading 24 bottles of wine for $320,000. Nothing is new under the sun.

Apr 11, 2013 9:19pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Tiamat333 wrote:
Agreed @DavidRoz. Let them eat cake with their wine. I’m surprised that he isn’t suing for more to also recoup the losses for his time and lawyer expenses.

Apr 11, 2013 9:47pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
byrond2 wrote:
One of the richest Republicans will spend $320,000 on two dozen bottles of wine but would rather see poor Americans go without food and basic medical care to save a little bit on taxes. GOP values.

Apr 11, 2013 10:16pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.