Australia university accused of bowing to China by barring Dalai Lama

CANBERRA Thu Apr 18, 2013 3:51am EDT

Tibet's exiled spiritual leader the Dalai Lama waves to spectators outside the Swiss Parliament building during his visit to Bern April 16, 2013. REUTERS/Pascal Lauener

Tibet's exiled spiritual leader the Dalai Lama waves to spectators outside the Swiss Parliament building during his visit to Bern April 16, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Pascal Lauener

Related Topics

CANBERRA (Reuters) - One of Australia's most exclusive universities has called off a talk to students by the Dalai Lama, prompting accusations it is bowing to China which has branded the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader a dangerous separatist.

Sydney University, ranked in the world's top 50, canceled the June visit by the Nobel Peace laureate to avoid damaging China ties, including funding for its cultural Confucius Institute, Tibetan activists and Australian lawmakers said.

"As a democratic country, we should be encouraging more open and frank discussion about the current situation in Tibet, not banning the country's spiritual leader from addressing students and staff at universities," said Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young, whose party wields the balance of power in the upper house of parliament.

Prime Minister Julia Gillard was heavily criticized for refusing to meet the Dalai Lama during a 2011 visit to avoid damaging two-way trade worth $120 billion last year.

Gillard this month led a trade delegation to meet Chinese Premier Li Keqiang, with both countries agreeing to a new strategic partnership including yearly talks between both leaders on foreign policy and economics.

China's human rights record in Tibet remains a controversial issue in Australia, a close U.S. ally, and Sydney University's new Institute for Democracy and Human Rights organized an on-campus talk by the Dalai Lama during his 10-day visit.

This was overturned by a decision to move the event off campus after the university warned organizers not to use its logo, allow media coverage or entry to the event by free Tibet activists.

Emails from university Vice-Chancellor Michael Spence, obtained by Australian television, expressed relief at the outcome, with Spence reportedly praising it as "in the best interests of researchers across the University".

A university spokesman said senior academic management never received an official request to host the Dalai Lama, but acknowledged a decision was taken to move the event.

"The university decided that there was a better way of doing it. A small group, a small section of the student body, was really not the best thing," the spokesman said.

Kyinzom Dhongdue, a pro-Tibetan independence spokeswoman for the Australia Tibet Council, said the university had given in to China, which was a major focus of academic studies.

"They have compromised their academic freedom and integrity, and it also sends a disheartening message to the Tibetan people," she said.

More than 100 Tibetans have set themselves alight since 2009 in protest against Chinese rule, mostly in heavily Tibetan areas of Sichuan, Gansu and Qinghai provinces rather than in the Tibet Autonomous Region of China. Most have died.

A Chinese official last month accused the Dalai Lama of providing money to encourage people to set themselves on fire.

China brands the Dalai Lama, who fled into exile in India in 1959 after an abortive uprising against Chinese rule of Tibet, as a separatist. The Dalai Lama says he is merely seeking more autonomy for his Himalayan homeland.

(Editing by Nick Macfie)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (9)
Free_Pacific wrote:
Corruptive influences and the erosion of Australian sovereignty.

Apr 18, 2013 5:50am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Cleveland2012 wrote:
The Australians bent a knee to Chinese power and money. Pretty cowardly. Why am I not surprised?

Apr 18, 2013 8:18am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Tiu wrote:
I don’t know, the Australian kow-tow to the American’s and are ruled over by the Queen of England, why not add grovelling to the Chinese into the mix. They do, after all, pay the bills.

Apr 18, 2013 8:34am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus