Senate should pass mental health bill after gun defeat: Manchin

WASHINGTON Thu Apr 18, 2013 12:24pm EDT

Senator Joe Manchin (D-WVA) takes a call outside a party policy luncheon on Capitol Hill in Washington April 9, 2013. REUTERS/Gary Cameron

Senator Joe Manchin (D-WVA) takes a call outside a party policy luncheon on Capitol Hill in Washington April 9, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Gary Cameron

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Senate should proceed with a stand-alone bill to improve mental health treatment to help stem gun violence after key parts of President Barack Obama's gun control agenda were defeated, a key senator involved in the effort said on Thursday.

Joe Manchin, the West Virginia Democrat who championed stronger background checks for gun purchases, said revisions to that proposal - and a better sales job - will be needed to give senators space to change their votes without appearing as "flip-floppers."

His proposal with Republican Senator Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania to extend background checks to Internet sales and gun shows on Wednesday fell six votes short of the 60 needed to advance in the 100-seat Senate.

"How do we get to the 68 to 70 votes we should have gotten? That's what we need to work on," Manchin told a breakfast sponsored by the Wall Street Journal.

He did not offer a time frame for offering a new version, adding that the Senate "pretty much is worn out" on the issue.

The Senate also defeated on Wednesday proposals to ban military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines.

But one area in which there is significant support in both parties is the improvement of mental health treatment in schools and efforts to prevent those judged mentally unfit from purchasing guns.

Manchin said Senate leaders should not wait on a mental health bill while they consider what to do next on background check measures.

"After I talked to the teachers in West Virginia, they need it now. If we can do it now, we should do it," Manchin said. "They don't need to wait until we strategize and put a package together that's more solid, in all honesty."

He said he would concentrate mental health treatment improvements and funding at the elementary school level, where behavioral problems can often be identified early by teachers.

Manchin's proposal attempted to limit new requirements for background checks to commercial transactions at gun shows and online, exempting private sales, but he said there was some confusion and misinformation surrounding that plan that was exploited by the National Rifle Association.

He said the NRA portrayed the background checks as a first step in a long-term effort to enact controls that would eventually lead to the registration and confiscation of guns - something he would never allow as a "gun-loving, Second Amendment defender."

Manchin, who will not have to face voters in his mountainous, pro-gun state for nearly six more years after winning re-election in 2012, said he can take any pressure from the NRA because he "must do what is right."

(Reporting by David Lawder; editing by Jackie Frank)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (26)
brotherkenny4 wrote:
Yes, put all those little crazies on ritilin and make them the drooling zombie consumer followers we so desire.

Apr 18, 2013 12:53pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Stickystones wrote:
But one area in which there is significant support in both parties is the improvement of mental health treatment in schools and efforts to prevent those judged mentally unfit from purchasing guns.

This is exactly what the original bill should have said. Because this is the biggest regulation that most people, including 68-70 Senators can agree on. Both Obama and the NRA made the battle wider by dubious claims, which ultimately caused nothing to be done. I think we’ve all seen from the recent attacks using guns, ricin, knives and pressure cookers the bigger issue is not the tool but the mentally ‘disturbed’ people.

Apr 18, 2013 12:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
TheNewWorld wrote:
@Stickystones

“I think we’ve all seen from the recent attacks using guns, ricin, knives and pressure cookers the bigger issue is not the tool but the mentally ‘disturbed’ people.”

How about the mentally disturbed peope that use unmanned drones to kill US civillians over seas? Or the ones designing new weapons and new ways to kill people. How do we define mentally disturbed? Is a young woman mentally disturbed 5 days a month? Does seasonal depression constitute mentally disturbed? What about the 5th Ammendment and our right to privacy? What if the Democrats want to label anyone who is a member of the Tea Party as mentally disturbed, or if the GOP wants to do the same to members of Green Peace. My point is this is a bit more complex of an issue than anyone wants to admit.

Apr 18, 2013 1:14pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.