UPDATE 1-LG Chem aims to start U.S. car battery plant in 2nd half - execs

Fri Apr 19, 2013 5:23am EDT

Related Topics

* Trial production will begin in July or Aug in Michigan - exec

* Slower-than-expected Volt demand delayed operation of U.S. battery plant

* LG Chem tries to minimise losses on electric car business - exec

SEOUL, April 19 (Reuters) - South Korea's LG Chem aims to start production at its U.S. car battery factory in the second half of this year, two executives said on Friday, as the firm tries to revive the plant's fortunes despite slow demand for electric vehicles.

"We plan to start a trial production in July or August," Kim Jong-hyun, head of LG Chem's battery division, told reporters on the sidelines of an earnings conference in Seoul.

With U.S. government funding worth over $150 million, LG Chem has constructed a $304 million lithium-ion battery cell manufacturing plant in Michigan, aiming to produce enough battery cells annually to equip 60,000 electric vehicles by the end of 2013.

But the plant has not started production because of slower than expected demand for electric vehicles. LG Chem supplies electric car batteries for General Motors' Volt and Ford Motor's Focus Electric from its South Korean facilities.

"We will start preparations for the plant's operation from the second half. It will soon commence operation," LG Chem's chief financial officer Cho Suk-jeh said.

GM's Volt sales in the United States tumbled 35 percent to less than 1,500 vehicles in March from a year earlier.

"Several years ago, there were high expectations of electric cars, but the market is slower than expected," Kim said, citing expensive car costs, lack of battery charging infrastructure and limited driving range as major stumbling blocks.

But Kim said as electric car prices go down, the market would expand. He said plug-in electric vehicles had more growth potential than hybrid ones, as automakers seek to cope with tougher emissions regulations and differentiate their models from rivals.

LG Chem, which also supplies batteries to the likes of Renault SA, suffered from losses in its electric car battery business in the January to March period because of lacklustre demand.

"We don't think we will be able to make profit on car battery business (this year). We are trying to minimise losses on car batteries," Cho said.

LG Chem, a unit of South Korean conglomerate LG Group, also produces chemicals products and supply small lithium-ion batteries for mobile devices such as Apple Inc's iPhones and LG Electronics' smartphones.

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
brotherkenny4 wrote:
Electric car demand will climb when the car companies put the price where it should be. They are resistent to the EVs because eventually they will be cheaper than gas powered cars and less complicated too, so then competion will be tougher and our domestic companies are not very good at competion.

On what planet or in what universe does a plant make a profit while it is still being built or just starting up? Reuters pretends like the fact that LG won’t make money right away is some endictment of the EV demand. What crap. Somebody please show me one major manufacturing plant that made a profit in it’s first year. Show me one major new car design that made money instantaneously. There are capital expenses that always need to be paid. This is just the standard disingenuous support for oil and hate for new markets.

A quote from the minds of the reuter’s editors: “We love our masters, those that advertise with us and we love doing as they say. It is easier to be a follower and do as the big money tells you.”

Apr 22, 2013 9:50am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.