Era of austerity has run its course, EU says

BRUSSELS Mon Apr 22, 2013 4:14pm EDT

European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso addresses a news conference in Vienna April 4, 2013. REUTERS/Leonhard Foeger

European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso addresses a news conference in Vienna April 4, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Leonhard Foeger

Related Topics

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - France and Spain fell short of their budget deficit goals last year and debt levels swelled across the euro zone but the pressure may be easing on Paris and Madrid as the European Commission signals an end to sharp spending cuts.

Outlining the state of Europe's accounts in 2012, the EU's statistics office Eurostat said on Monday that France posted a deficit of 4.8 percent of economic output, higher than its 4.5 percent target. Spain's shortfall was the largest in the EU.

With budget cuts blamed for a second straight year of recession, the EU's top economics official Olli Rehn indicated over the weekend that more flexibility on tough economic targets was needed. His boss, European Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso, said on Monday that austerity had reached its natural limits of popular support.

"While I think this policy is fundamentally right, I think it has reached its limits," he told a conference. "A policy to be successful not only has to be properly designed, it has to have the minimum of political and social support."

Budget cuts have been at the centre of the euro zone's strategy to overcome a three-year public debt crisis but they are also blamed for a damaging cycle where governments cut back, companies lay off staff, Europeans buy less and young people have little hope of finding a job.

Crippling levels of unemployment and outbreaks of violence in southern Europe are now forcing a rethink, with the focus shifting to economic growth strategies.

Despite cuts and tax increases, Spain's budget shortfall was 7.1 percent, excluding bank recapitalization, higher than the government's 6.98 percent official year-end reading and well above Madrid's original target of 6.3 percent.

Adding in the cost of recapitalizing Spain's banks and a 40 billion euro ($52 billion) bank bailout from the euro zone, Spain's deficit was nearly 11 percent in 2012, higher than the European Commission's forecast of 10.2 percent, and an increase from the 9.4 percent deficit of 2011.

That was higher than Greece, and the highest in the EU.

The euro zone's combined sovereign debt burden also hit a record of 90.6 percent of GDP in 2012, Eurostat said.


The shift in austerity policies is backed by an improving picture overall, however. The 17-nation euro zone's combined fiscal deficit was 3.7 percent of gross domestic product, compared with 4.2 percent in 2011 and 6.5 percent in 2010.

Partly as a result, both Spain and France are expected to get more time to reach EU-mandated targets of 3 percent.

"We need to combine the indispensable correction in public finances, huge deficits, huge public debt ... with proper measures for growth," Barroso said in a speech in Brussels just before Eurostat released its data.

EU leaders are desperate for economic growth, and the Commission will decide on May 29 whether to recommend to EU finance ministers to give Paris and Madrid until 2015 to cut their fiscal gap to 3 percent of GDP, today targeted for 2014.

It is not yet clear just how big a policy shift EU policymakers are planning.

Rehn, the EU's economic and monetary affairs commissioner, told Reuters in Washington on Thursday that financial leaders from the group of 20 economies calling for less austerity were "preaching to the converted."

Rehn is looking increasingly at countries' fiscal efforts in structural terms, which means removing the effects of the business cycle and one-off measures on the budget.

But Germany and the European Central Bank want to see the euro zone put its finances in order after a decade of borrowing when countries' debt and deficit levels rose dramatically.

In addition, the EU's Fiscal Compact treaty signed by all EU countries, except Britain and the Czech Republic, in March 2012 requires governments to keep the budget in balance or surplus with a structural deficit no higher than 0.5 pct of GDP.

"I can't see there's been a big change and that austerity is off the table," said Jurgen Michels, an economist at Citigroup. "Most countries will have to come out with additional, substantial fiscal measures in order to meet their new targets."

(Additional reporting by Martin Santa; Editing by Jeremy Gaunt and Robin Pomeroy)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (8)
xyz2055 wrote:
And here in lays the paradox of trying to eliminate massive deficit spending by governments. Particularly during a weak economy. Austerity will not work. Every dollar spent by governments produces jobs. Either directly in government agencies or in private companies that produce goods and services. If you cut billions of dollars a year in government spending, you are taking billions of dollars out of that economy. When unemployment is already too high, you are simply adding to the problem. The time to tackle the U.S. deficit would have been during the last years of the Clinton administration and when GWB first took office, We had a $18B annual deficit at the time. Instead, they went on the largest drunken sailor spending spree of all time. Tackling the deficits much less the debt now will prove to be very painful and like in the EU, probably not successful. With an aging population that is growing larger every year have a very serious problem.

Apr 22, 2013 8:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Robocop5626 wrote:
Trillions of dollars on additional Solyndras and Fiskars won’t create any jobs, government or private, but will enhance the wealth of the bundlers and other cronies of the President. The government spent a massive traunch of stimulus cash that only swelled the deficit. The only defense offered is “it wasn’t big enough”. Dear God how much will it cost? Is this one of those liberal analogies where if it costs millions of trillions it is fine as long as it creates a single job? Unemployment is so pervasive and long term today the number is dropping because people stopped looking for jobs. Of course they could simply pay people to stay home. Wait, that’s called welfare and it too has yielded little in the way of return as far as jobs or employment. Maybe they could hire thousands to stand around construction cones and lean on shovels as the new “shovel ready” WPA!The US economy will remain mired until the albatross known as ACA is fully implemented. It may wind up plunging the country back into a worse economic recession with the escalating costs. Even the Dems are starting to show sweat on their brows!

Apr 22, 2013 8:56pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
xyz2055 wrote: was the Republicans during the GW administration that passed TARP. They bailed out AIG, which was an international company founded in China. The vast majority of their employees were in foreign countries and weren’t even Americans. Why? Because AIG owed Goldman Sachs billions. Bush’s Secretary of the Treasury was Hank Paulson, ex-CEO of Goldman. Talk about cronyism. If you think this problem is purely the fault of liberals and are delusional.

Apr 22, 2013 9:11pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.