US court sets schedule for FAA furlough case; denied emergency stay

WASHINGTON Mon Apr 22, 2013 5:31pm EDT

1 of 2. Airline passengers head to a flight at San Francisco International Airport in San Francisco, California April 22, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Robert Galbraith

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. court charged with deciding whether to order the Federal Aviation Administration to abandon its plan to furlough air traffic controllers set out a preliminary schedule for the case on Monday, after denying an request for an emergency stay.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit set a May 22 deadline for the two sides to file documents in the case, which pits the Airlines for America (A4A), the main U.S. airline industry group, against the FAA.

A4A filed suit on Friday asking the court to "vacate" FAA's furlough plan and to order the agency to find a different way to meet budget cuts mandated by Congress.

The court, within hours, denied a request for an emergency stay to block the furlough plan.

But "the underlying lawsuit is alive and well," A4A spokeswoman Victoria Day said in an email on Monday.

The FAA on Sunday started furloughing 47,000 workers, including many air traffic controllers, for up to 11 days over the rest of the fiscal year to implement mandatory budget cuts.

A4A, joined by the Air Line Pilots Association and the Regional Airline Association, warned in the lawsuit that the furloughs would cause massive delays and other problems for air travelers and shippers in coming months.

The airline industry will continue to push for a legislative solution to stop the furloughs while waiting for the court to make its decision, Day said.

The court has not yet set dates for a briefing or for oral arguments, she said.

(Reporting by Doug Palmer; Editing by Steve Orlofsky)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (1)
Stickystones wrote:
How ironic is it that the airlines will lose substantially more money than the sequester cuts that affect the FAA? Very ironic, for someone that is trying to boost employment and act concerned about the economy. It is not what you say, it’s what you do that matters most!

Apr 22, 2013 7:17pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus