United States, Russia agree to try to revive Syria plan

BRUSSELS Tue Apr 23, 2013 3:01pm EDT

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry gestures during a news conference at the NATO headquarters in Brussels April 23, 2013. REUTERS/Evan Vucci/Pool

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry gestures during a news conference at the NATO headquarters in Brussels April 23, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Evan Vucci/Pool

Related Topics

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said on Tuesday he and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov had agreed to look for ways to revive a Syrian peace plan, but admitted that doing so would be extremely difficult.

Kerry, speaking after talks with Lavrov and NATO colleagues in Brussels, also backed away from earlier comments suggesting he was calling for increased NATO contingency planning on Syria.

Kerry said he and Lavrov had discussed ways to revive a peace plan agreed in Geneva last June that called for a transitional government.

"We are both going to go back, we are going to explore those possibilities, and we are going to talk again about if any of those other avenues could conceivably be pursued," Kerry said.

He said that while there might be a difference of opinion between Russia and the United States about when and how Syrian President Bashar al-Assad might leave office, "I don't think there's a difference of opinion that his leaving may either be inevitable or necessary to be able to have a solution."

But, he stressed: "I would say to you that's it's a very difficult road ... No one should think there is an easy way to move forward on this."

Moscow has for months been calling for implementation of the Geneva Declaration agreed by world powers including Russia and the United States, but disagrees with Washington's assertion that it requires Assad to step down.

Lavrov said last week that pressing for Assad's removal would increase the threats posed by militant Islamist groups such as the rebel al-Nusra Front, which formally pledged allegiance this month to al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahri.

Lavrov told a news conference on Tuesday the Geneva agreement could "not be interpreted in various ways; it has no ambiguity."

"Everyday more people are killed. However I see a growing understanding of the urgency to go from calls for election to real actions. That is why I hope we will see concrete actions on everybody's side," he said.

NATO ROLE

Kerry said in a statement to a meeting of NATO ministers earlier that the alliance needed "to consider its role in the Syrian crisis, including how practically prepared it was to respond to a potential chemical weapons threat".

"We should also carefully and collectively consider how NATO is prepared to respond to protect its members from a Syrian threat, including any potential chemical weapons threat," he said, according to a copy of his prepared remarks provided by the State Department

At the news conference, Kerry, who is attending his first NATO ministerial as secretary of state, said he had not called for more planning.

"I didn't ask for additional planning. I think it might have been the secretary-general or somebody who commented that we may need to do some additional planning, but there is no specific request," he said.

"What there was from me was a very clear statement about the threat of chemical weapons and the potential for chemical weapons, generically, to fall into bad hands.

"What I did suggest to everybody was that we therefore need to all be thinking about how we can get to the negotiating table to avoid an implosion of Syria, which would be the worst consequence."

NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen told a news conference the alliance was "extremely concerned about the use of ballistic missiles in Syria and the possible use of chemical weapons."

He said the alliance was worried about the risk of the conflict spilling over Syria's borders and said the alliance was willing to defend Turkey. "We have all plans ready to ensure effective defense and protection of Turkey," he said.

PATRIOTS

NATO, a U.S.-led military alliance of 28 countries, has said repeatedly it has no intention of intervening militarily in the Syrian civil war, although it has sent Patriot missile batteries to Turkey to help defend the NATO member against possible attack from Syria.

At his news conference, Kerry also said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had not been able to confirm to him in a telephone call on Tuesday comments by the Israeli military's top intelligence analyst that Syrian government forces had used chemical weapons.

"I think it is fair for me to say that he was not in a position to confirm that in the conversation that I had," Kerry said. "I don't know yet what the facts are."

Kerry had been asked about comments by Brigadier-General Itai Brun, an Israeli intelligence analyst, at a Tel Aviv security conference that Syrian forces had used chemical weapons, probably nerve gas, in their fight against rebels.

U.S. President Barack Obama has called the use of chemical weapons a "red line" for the United States that would trigger unspecified U.S. action.

(Reporting by David Brunnstrom, Justyna Pawlak and Adrian Croft; Editing by Jon Hemming)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
xcanada2 wrote:
This sounds like it could be very good news for the Syrian people. In my opinion, it is a reasonable way forward, to make common cause with Russia. Russia and Iran definitely have the moral high ground, and we (with our Quatar and Saudi dictatorship allies) have been digging ourselves into a deeper hole to hell.

Forcing democracy down Syrian throats with an Al Queda gun does not make any sense at all. It’s what you get though from people with no moral scruples.

Apr 23, 2013 4:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Fromkin wrote:
“He said that while there might be a difference of opinion between Russia and the United States about when and how Syrian President Bashar al-Assad might leave office, “I don’t think there’s a difference of opinion that his leaving may either be inevitable or necessary to be able to have a solution.”

No way! Bashar el-Assad is the man of the situation for the next 15 years. Syria doesn’t need puppets or thugs to run it.

Why is the US negotiating with Russia about Syria, which has had nothing to do with the US government for years?

There is no reason for more agreements between the US and Russia. The agreement should be between Syrians themselves. Just implement the Geneva accord which states that Syrians need to sit at a negotiating table and come up with a transitional government that will organize the next election in 2014. And no one should be excluded.

Apr 23, 2013 5:02pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
reality-again wrote:
@xcabada

“Russia and Iran definitely have the moral high ground”

???

Do you expect anyone in their right mind not to laugh at such an absurd statement?
This is not a time for joking.

Apr 23, 2013 5:15pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.