Republicans advance bill to prepare for debt ceiling fight

WASHINGTON Wed Apr 24, 2013 4:52pm EDT

House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at National Harbor, Maryland March 15, 2013. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) at National Harbor, Maryland March 15, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A key committee of the House of Representatives approved a measure on Wednesday designed to make it easier for Republicans to again withhold approval of a rise in the government debt ceiling to extract spending cuts from President Barack Obama.

The government is expected to hit the limit set by Congress on its ability to borrow money by late July or early August. Without an increase in the limit - known as the debt ceiling - the United States faces the prospect of defaulting on its debts, which could shake up markets and damage the economy.

The bill, approved by the Republican-controlled House Ways and Means Committee, would seek to avoid default by requiring the U.S. Treasury to pay public bond holders - as well as beneficiaries of the government-run Social Security retirement plan - in the event Congress refuses to raise the debt ceiling.

"What this does is it removes that uncertainty and takes the threat of default off the table," Republican Representative Paul Ryan of Wisconsin said.

Ryan acknowledged after the meeting that in his view, it would also strip the White House of talking points it uses against Republican tactics in negotiating over the debt ceiling.

In previous disputes when Republicans have threatened to block an increase in the debt ceiling, the president has accused the party of jeopardizing Social Security payments and shirking its responsibility to pay the nation's bills.

While the bill may pass the Republican-dominated House, it will almost certainly fail to win approval in the Democratic-controlled U.S. Senate.

Democrats view the measure, which they call "prioritization," as a ploy designed to legitimize Republican tactics.

"Let's be clear, prioritization by any name is default," said Representative Sander Levin of Michigan, the top Democrat on the Ways and Means Committee.

A partisan battle over the debt ceiling was resolved in August, 2011 with a deal that led to the automatic, across-the board spending cuts that started to take effect on March 1. Among other things, the "sequester" made reductions in the budget of the Federal Aviation Administration that this week led to flight delays across the country.

Obama has been adamant that he will not negotiate over the debt ceiling again.

(Editing by Eric Walsh)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (10)
speaker12 wrote:
What is the sense of trying to resolve our financial problems when we have elected the biggest spender in history? This community organizer is so used to spending other people’s money that the concept of working for a living and not spending money you don’t have is not his way of thinking. Reality, what a concept.

Apr 24, 2013 5:10pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
breezinthru wrote:
What a bunch of clowns! After the last election, several high profile Republicans acknowledge that they should stop making doing things that people don’t like.

Apparently, they are still more interested in firing up their base than in attracting enough non-baseline voters for them to win power at the national level.

Apr 24, 2013 5:33pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Harry079 wrote:
Again the debt limit set by Congress was hit December 31, 2012.

Your article is so full of holes you might just want to make some swiss cheese out of it.

Apr 24, 2013 9:23pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.