Alaska mine would damage streams and wetlands: EPA report

ANCHORAGE, Alaska Fri Apr 26, 2013 11:12pm EDT

Related Topics

ANCHORAGE, Alaska (Reuters) - Digging a large mine in southwest Alaska would inflict widespread ecological damage, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said in a report on Friday that could hurt the chances of a proposed project in that region winning regulatory approval.

A large scale open-pit mine in Alaska's unspoiled Bristol Bay region would destroy up to 90 miles of salmon and trout spawning streams, harm thousands of acres of wetlands that support fish and subject local waters to chemical spills and releases of untreated wastewater, the EPA report said.

The report did not specifically analyze the plan for Pebble Mine, the project proposed for the area, because developers have not officially made permit applications. But it studied the implications of a hypothetical project similar to Pebble. (EPA report:

Pebble Mine, located 200 miles southwest of Anchorage, would be one of the world's largest open-pit copper mines. Developers have described it as a potential economic boon that would target both known and anticipated reserves of 80 billion lbs (36.3 billion kg) of copper, over 100 million ounces (2.8 million kg) of gold and 5.5 billion pounds (2.5 billion kg) of molybdenum.

But the latest EPA report predicted a wider scope of environmental damage than outlined in a draft report the agency released last year.

The EPA's conclusion drew a pointed reaction from the mine's developer, Pebble Limited Partnership President John Shively, who called the latest version of the assessment "flawed" and a waste of public money.

Shively in a statement blasted EPA for what he said was a decision to heed mine opponents' demands for a "pre-emptive veto" before development plans are final.

Even "the threat of a ‘pre-emptive veto' will introduce uncertainty into the process that threatens to hurt the entire U.S. economy, not just a proposed mine in Alaska," Shively said.

The new EPA assessment backs up the previous draft report's conclusions about stream and wetlands damages, but gives more details about expected damages from roads, culverts, traffic accidents and other industrialization that would likely accompany mine development.

The EPA has made no decision about whether to invoke its legal powers to block the Pebble Mine, said Dennis McLarren, Pacific Northwest regional director for the agency.

The new report will be used to make any decisions about Bristol Bay protections, McLarren said in a conference call.

"We want to better understand the delicate ecological balance the produces the extraordinary fish and wildlife resources in Bristol Bay and assess the risk that mining could pose to that balance," he said.

Developers have already spent $680 million on the Pebble Mine project and plan to spend another $80 million this year, co-owner Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd said this week. The other owner and Pebble partner is mining giant Anglo American.

The Pebble Mine plan has drawn fury from commercial and sport fishermen, Alaska Natives and environmentalists.

It is upstream from waters that hold the world's largest sockeye salmon runs and other rich marine life, including endangered whales and other vulnerable marine mammals. On land, national wildlife refuges and parks are nearby.

(Editing by Alex Dobuzinskis and Lisa Shumaker)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (5)
Big2Tex wrote:
So once again the Obama led Eco-Communists destroy any chance of economic recovery and economic prosperity for America. You who voted for this clown deserve all of the suffering, hardship, poverty, and despair possible. Enjoy the rest of your miserable lives.

Apr 27, 2013 6:43am EDT  --  Report as abuse
WhyMeLord wrote:
Gaining some economic gain at the expense of the world in which we all must live is typical “logic” of Texaa and Alaska GOP/NRA wing-nuts. Rather than make their money by building things, which would require some basic mental skills, they make their money by destroying things, like the air we breath and the water we drink. We would all be better off if we sold Alaska back to Russia, and sold Texas back to Mexico. Nothing good has come out of either besides empty Greyhound busses.

Apr 27, 2013 10:43am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Saydi wrote:
Yes as always with big business the economy should come before clean air, water, wildlife, and indigenous people who will not at all profit but will loose their ability to provide food for themselves and their children, the water will be full of carcinogens, the fish and wildlife will die along with the people. “The river used to be blue. Now it’s brown. Nobody can
fish or drink from it. The air is bad. This has all happened
so fast,” said Elsie Fabian, 63, an elder in a Native
community along the Athabasca River- copied from the Indigenous Tar Sands Campaign. But people have JOBS? Mr. Shively and his board of directors, ceo’s and others should be made to live on the Athabasca River for a year or two, then tell everyone what a wonderful thing a toxic mine is capable of, maybe this would humble these arrogant men.

Apr 27, 2013 1:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus