Senate foes of gun bill suffer in polls

WASHINGTON Mon Apr 29, 2013 6:42pm EDT

A row of shotguns are seen during the East Coast Fine Arms Show in Stamford, Connecticut, January 5, 2013. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri

A row of shotguns are seen during the East Coast Fine Arms Show in Stamford, Connecticut, January 5, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Carlo Allegri

Related Topics

Photo

Air strikes in Gaza

Our latest photos from the scene.   Slideshow 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Five senators - four Republicans and one Democrat - could face voter backlash for opposing President Barack Obama's bid to expand background checks for gun buyers, opinion polls released on Monday showed.

According to the surveys conducted by Public Policy Polling, a private firm based in Raleigh, N.C., respondents said they are more apt to oppose than support these lawmakers for re-election for joining other senators in rejecting a bipartisan background check measure on April 17.

The results were publicized in a conference call organized by Americans United For Change, a liberal organization. Public Policy Polling is considered a Democratic-leaning company.

Political analysts say it's unclear if this sentiment will persist or subside by Election Day. The next time any of the five senators face voters will be November 2014.

The gun legislation was defeated in the Senate, 54-46, six short of the 60 needed to clear a procedural hurdle. All but four members of the 55-member Senate Democrat Caucus voted yes; all but four of the 45 Senate Republicans voted no.

Public Policy Polling surveyed constituents of five senators who opposed the measure: Republicans Jeff Flake of Arizona, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Rob Portman of Ohio, and Dean Heller of Nevada, and Democrat Mark Begich of Alaska.

The surveys found 60 to 72 percent public support in each state for expanding background checks to require them in sales at gun shows and on the Internet. The measure was opposed by the National Rifle Association, a powerful gun-rights group.

In Arizona, 52 percent of respondents said they are now "less likely" to support Flake for re-election. The poll gave him a disapproval rating of 51 percent.

In Alaska, the poll found Begich and Murkowski with approval ratings of 41 percent and 46 percent, respectively. Thirty-nine percent said they are now "less likely" to vote for Begich for reelection, and the same number said they are "less likely" to vote for Murkowski. Twenty-two percent said they are "more likely" to back Begich; 26 percent said they are "more likely" to back Murkowski.

In Ohio, the poll found Portman with an approval rating of 26 percent. Thirty-six percent said they are "less likely" to support him for a second term; 19 percent said they were "more likely."

In Nevada, Heller has an approval rating of 44 percent. Forty-six percent said they were "less likely" to back him for reelection; 25 percent said "more likely."

"It's very clear that these senators are paying a political price for this vote," said Tom Jensen, director of Public Policy Polling. "Public opinion remains strongly against them."

'STICKINESS TO THE ISSUE'

Geoffrey Garin, president of Hart Research Associates, said many senators had figured that the issue would fade away after the vote, with the public quickly turning to other matters.

"Those assumptions have been proven wrong," Garin said. "There is a stickiness to this issue."

Garin and Jensen spoke in the conference call organized by Americans United For Change.

Public Policy Polling released a survey last week that found another senator who opposed the background check measure also in possible trouble with voters.

The poll found the approval rating of Republican Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire at 44 percent, down 15 points since the last poll conducted of her by the firm in October.

For years, many members of Congress have feared voting to toughen gun laws, knowing that the gun-rights lobby would and could target them for defeat.

But in wake of the school massacre in Newtown, Connecticut, in December, gun-control groups have been energized to go after lawmakers who oppose their cause.

Sixty-five percent of Americans - 85 percent of Democrats and 45 percent of Republicans - believe the Senate should have passed the bill, according to a Gallup poll also released on Monday. The Gallup survey, which had a margin of error of plus or minus 4 percentage points, sampled 2049 adults across the country.

Republican Senator Patrick Toomey of Pennsylvania wrote the bipartisan background check measure with Democratic Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia.

A survey released last week by Quinnipiac University found that voters may be pleased with Toomey's action. The poll gave him an approval rating of 48 percent, up 5 points from the previous month, and the highest ever found by Quinnipiac for the senator. He was elected in 2010 with 51 percent of the vote.

Manchin, appearing on Fox News on Sunday, said he and Toomey may take another crack at trying to win passage of their background check measure.

Toomey may not be interested, however, figuring that at this point it would again be rejected, an aide said.

"There would have to be a change in the atmosphere to yield a different outcome. That seems unlikely in the near future," the aide said.

In Alaska, 1,166 voters were surveyed with a margin of error of plus or minus 2.9 percent; 600 Arizona voters with a margin of error of 4 percent; 500 Nevada voters with a margin of error of 4.4 percent; and 601 Ohio voters with a margin of error of 4 percent.

(Reporting By Thomas Ferraro; Editing by Fred Barbash and Cynthia Osterman)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (28)
TheNewWorld wrote:
“The results were publicized in a conference call organized by Americans United For Change, a liberal organization. Public Policy Polling is considered a Democratic-leaning company.”

They found the results that they wanted to find. That isn’t very hard to do with polling, all that is required is find predominantly Democrat areas to conduct your polls, and word the questions in a way to get the answer you want. Both the right and the left do this constantly. The only poll that counts is the vote.

Apr 29, 2013 6:53pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
50cal wrote:
TheNewWorld

And Public Policy Polling is located in NC where the Dumocatic Headquarters are. And we all know how neutrual reuters is…here is a rebutt:

Gotta love it when thigs go right! Lots and lots of jobs just thrown away over a bunch of laws that do NOTHING to help the problem-justice.

“In Connecticut, where venerable gunmakers like Colt [Colt has had the contract with the US Army forever-big bucks] and Sturm, Ruger & Co. have been joined in the last decade or so by upstarts like Stag Arms and PTR, reform of gun laws in the wake of the Sandy Hook school shootings has left the industry feeling unwelcome. Bristol-based high-end rifle manufacturer PTR Industries announced this month via Facebook that it would be taking its 40 jobs and $50,000 weekly payroll to an unspecified new state, widely believed to be Texas.”

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/04/29/gun-manufacturers-start-leaving-states-that-passed-new-gun-control-laws/

These “extended background checks”. They would not have mattered either.

insanity-again and again, same results. obama is over the edge and dragging more folks with him everyday….baaaaa

Apr 29, 2013 7:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
TheNewWorld wrote:
Well I agree with you on this issue. The President is pushing knee-jerk legislation with little answers on how it is going to be implemented, enforced, and how it is going to prevent any tragedies. For example, lets keep people with mental health issues from buying guns. Sounds good, but who are those with mental health issues? Anxiety? Depression? Mood swings? Hormonal imbalances? What qualifies and what doesn’t? You want to make sure that any private party gun sales also perform a background check? How do you enforce that, and how do you track that?

Apr 29, 2013 7:38pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.