Turkey investigates use of chemical weapons in Syria

REYHANLI, Turkey Wed May 1, 2013 6:20pm EDT

Syrian doctor Ubada Alabrash who helps treat Syrian patients at Reyhanli hospital gestures during an interview with Reuters in Reyhanli, on the Turkish-Syrian border in Hatay province May 1, 2013. REUTERS/Osman Orsal

Syrian doctor Ubada Alabrash who helps treat Syrian patients at Reyhanli hospital gestures during an interview with Reuters in Reyhanli, on the Turkish-Syrian border in Hatay province May 1, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Osman Orsal

Photo

Air strikes in Syria

The aftermath of strikes on IS targets in Syria.  Slideshow 

REYHANLI, Turkey (Reuters) - Turkey is testing blood samples taken from Syrian casualties brought over the border from fighting in recent days to determine whether they were victims of a chemical weapons attack, local government and health officials said on Wednesday.

The samples were sent to Turkey's forensic medicine institute after several Syrians with breathing difficulties were brought to a Turkish hospital on Monday in the town of Reyhanli in Hatay province along the Syrian border.

"We are taking the necessary precautions as we have received unconfirmed information on the use of chemical weapons," Reyhanli Mayor Huseyin Sanverdi told Reuters.

"So far I have not received confirmation from medical institutions but there is a possibility that the weapons were used and we have to act with caution in case," he said.

Sanverdi said the hospital in Reyhanli had taken emergency measures on Monday following the claims but that those had now been lifted. He added that Monday's patients had been brought from Idlib province in northern Syria.

U.S. President Barack Obama on Tuesday said there was evidence that chemical weapons had been used during Syria's two year conflict, but that it was not yet known how the chemical weapons were used, when they were used and who used them.

Washington has long said it views the use of chemical weapons in Syria as a "red line", but wary of the false intelligence that was used to justify the 2003 war in Iraq, it has said it wants proof before taking action.

Britain last week confirmed it had "limited but persuasive" information showing chemical weapons use in Syria, including sarin, evidence that the Foreign Office now says is "physiological" - from the bodies of chemical attack victims.

A Foreign Office spokesman said it was likely that Syria, and not the rebels, would be behind any such attack, and Britain added that it was working with the United Nations to harden up evidence of whether chemical weapons had been used.

Fighting in Syria, now entering its third year, has intensified in the last month with government forces attempting to roll back rebel advances. Some 70,000 people have now been killed in the civil war.

Each side has blamed the other for what they both said was a chemical attack in the city of Saraqeb in Idlib on Monday.

EMERGENCY PLANS

A senior Reyhanli health official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, confirmed Sanverdi's statement, saying the hospital carried out "emergency plans from time to time".

One hospital employee, who also declined to be named, described how the hospital had been sealed off into the night on Monday, with specialized emergency medical teams moving in to take over after 13 patients from Idlib were brought in.

"We were given special apparel but it was the emergency team which took care of those patients. Doctors suspected sarin or mustard gas because the patients had breathing difficulties," the employee said.

Another hospital employee said staff were ordered to stay back while the team intervened.

"This cannot be without reason," the second employee said.

Wassim Taha, a Syrian doctor from the Union of Syrian Medical Relief Organisations which runs hospitals for the Syrian opposition, said the patients were washed at the border because doctors feared they had come into contact with a form of gas.

A second Syrian doctor, Ubada Alabrash, who helps treat Syrian patients at Reyhanli hospital, said they also suspected the patients had been victims of a chemical attack because those escorting them to the border had exhibited similar symptoms.

Alabrash said blood samples from the patients had been sent for tests but that they had not been given the results.

"I don't think the Turkish government would hide the results from us, but I understand they must be careful with it because NATO and other international bodies are also involved in this issue," he said.

"Now we are waiting for the blood test results from Ankara, we have asked to be informed. We can only say after the test results if chemical weapons were used or not."

(Additional reporting by Mohammed Abbas in London; writing by Jonathon Burch; editing by Mike Collett-White)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
50cal wrote:
Why? No matter what they find it will be denied by king obama and the red line will remain with out violations. For some reason it has become acceptable and permissible to use nerve gass on children for political gain. For some reason it does not conjure up visions of an infant in a crib foaming at the mouth and gasping for air. It conjures up delusions of grandeur by idiots thinking they will have some kind of personal victory with witty cynicisms over some other idiot on a keyboard half a world away. The world of 1s and 0s has made us all into evil literary demons just to think it is proper to debate it. Well almost all of us…I have to puke…and then I think I am done with the whole scene. I really don’t see God helping any of us at this point so I am not even going to ask.

May 01, 2013 3:52pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
McBob08 wrote:
Yes, get EVIDENCE first! THEN, a rational, effective action can be decided upon. These knee-jerk responses that the Republicans want always make things worse. We need common sense and rationality to rule, not hysteria and buzz-words.

Another Middle Eastern war is the WORST thing to start right now.

May 01, 2013 11:05pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
oxen wrote:
Turkey’s investigation will be the most unreliable investigation in modern times. What a fuss Turkey is making? It demeans the suffering of the people in Syria , nevertheless Turkey can only investigate nature of chemicals that have harmed people for purposes of treating the injured because the rebels have also been accused of using dangerous cocktails of chemicals. Only the UN should put up a credible investigation as the Syrian Govt requested and international community expects -anything short of that is obviously a sham and foolhardy or just an excuse to use for NATO to attack Syria and install a puppet regime-which they wont because the religion will out flank so called allies after the regime is bombed out by NATO. And the inspectors need not be the puppet types for NATO.

May 02, 2013 1:05am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus