Israel's Netanyahu says would put peace deal to referendum

JERUSALEM Thu May 2, 2013 10:55am EDT

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem April 28, 2013. REUTERS/Sebastian Scheiner/Pool

Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu attends the weekly cabinet meeting in Jerusalem April 28, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Sebastian Scheiner/Pool

Related Topics

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Thursday he would put any peace deal with the Palestinians to a referendum, raising expectations that direct negotiations might soon resume following a two-year stalemate.

It was the second time in just three days that Netanyahu has publicly mentioned the possibility of holding a nationwide vote on an eventual accord and came as U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry met Israeli politicians in Washington to discuss talks.

"If we get to a peace agreement with the Palestinians, I'd like to bring it to a referendum, and I'd like to talk to you about your experiences with that," Netanyahu said as he met Swiss Foreign Minister Didier Burkhalter.

Switzerland regularly holds referendum on a broad range of issues. Israel, by contrast, has never held a referendum in its 65-year history, and previous peace treaties with Arab neighbors Egypt and Jordan were approved by parliament.

Netanyahu leads a center-right coalition that includes supporters of the settlement movement, many of whom are fiercely opposed to the idea of allowing the Palestinians an independent state on land seized by Israel in the 1967 war.

By pledging to put any deal to a referendum, Netanyahu could be hoping to avert any immediate far-right backlash to a decision to talk land-for-peace with the Palestinians, promising that the Israeli people would have the final word.

"There is a very serious effort under way to get talks to resume," said a senior Israeli official who declined to be named. "People are devoting a lot of time and effort to this. It is possible and it is doable."

OBSTACLES

U.S. President Barack Obama came to Jerusalem in March and his secretary of state has visited the region three times in little over six weeks. Kerry was due to see Israeli Justice Minister Tzipi Livni later on Thursday in Washington.

Livni has been designated by Netanyahu to be his chief peace negotiator. She was traveling with one of the prime minister's top officials and confidants, Yitzhak Molcho.

Direct peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians broke down in 2010 over the issue of continued Jewish settlement building on 1967 land. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas says he will not return to the table until there is a construction freeze. Israel says there should be no pre-conditions.

Unexpectedly highlighting the issue of referendum has fueled hopes that the impasse might soon be overcome. However, there was little sign that the core questions dividing the two sides, including the status of Jerusalem, were any nearer resolution.

"No one thinks we are near a historic agreement. But any historic agreement will need national legitimacy," the Israeli official said.

The Palestinians have also said that they would hold a referendum on an eventual accord, with no guarantees that their diverse electorate, including the far-flung refugee population, would accept the likely compromises needed to seal a deal.

Israel passed a law in 2010 for a referendum to approve any handover of East Jerusalem or the Golan Heights, territory captured in the 1967 war and which it has annexed.

Moves are under way in parliament to expand that law to include the West Bank, which has not been annexed and is under Israeli military occupation.

(Editing by Crispian Balmer)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
bbsnews wrote:
“Israel passed a law in 2010 for a referendum to approve any handover of East Jerusalem or the Golan Heights, territory captured in the 1967 war and which it has annexed.”

Sigh. What has happened to truthful reporting? The “annexation” of the Golan Heights and East Jerusalem are not recognized by the United States or the international community and are illegal.

Reuters, you really should have a senior editor take a look at these types of reports because reading this a normal person is likely to come away thinking that the “annexations” of these lands that do not belong to Israel are normal and legal.

Both are illegal. Please fix your error and report the facts according to the law and United Nations resolutions.

Kudos to at least at the end of the story where you reported that this referendum issue is not new. Savvy readers will know this is going to be used politically to sink any possibility of a durable and viable agreement; all one has to do is review the Israeli Partly Free press throughout the 2000′s for proof of this.

May 02, 2013 10:53am EDT  --  Report as abuse
americanguy wrote:
We can always hope.

May 02, 2013 10:55am EDT  --  Report as abuse
bbsnews wrote:
Americanguy – I used to have hope, as I pointed out here yesterday: http://bbsnews.net/poor-john-kerry-peace-effort-with-israel-is-doomed/ but it is as unlikely as it has been during any other previous effort because of one very simple reason – the United States finances and protects Israel’s illegal occupations.

That fact is in particular why so many in the Muslim world distrust and hate the United States, and by ignoring the root cause of that hatred – Israel’s ongoing decades long illegal and belligerent occupations – we here in the US are not seen as a fair arbiter of negotiations because we are the ones financing the occupations, providing military hardware for the occupations and providing cover through automatic Security Council vetoes.

When Reuters and other news organizations do not cover those facts or even mention that “annexations” or “capture[s]” of territory violate international laws and norms, there is really no hope. None.

May 02, 2013 12:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.