Obama on airstrikes: Israel has to guard against Hezbollah

SAN JOSE Sat May 4, 2013 5:04pm EDT

U.S. President Barack Obama speaks during a forum on Inclusive Economic Growth and Development hosted by INCAE, a Costa Rican business school, and the Inter-American Development Bank, in San Jose May 4, 2013. REUTERS/Juan Carlos Ulate

U.S. President Barack Obama speaks during a forum on Inclusive Economic Growth and Development hosted by INCAE, a Costa Rican business school, and the Inter-American Development Bank, in San Jose May 4, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Juan Carlos Ulate

SAN JOSE (Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama said on Saturday that Israel has the right to guard against the transfer of advanced weapons to Hezbollah a day after Israel attacked a Hezbollah-bound missile shipment in Syria.

Israel has long made clear it is prepared to resort to force to prevent advanced Syrian weapons from reaching Hezbollah or jihadi rebels. Israeli warplanes went after the shipment inside Syria, where a two-year civil war is raging.

Obama, in an interview with the Spanish-language network Telemundo as part of a three-day Latin America tour that ended in Costa Rica, would not comment on whether the airstrikes had in fact taken place.

"I'll let the Israeli government confirm or deny whatever strikes that they've taken," he said.

But Obama, who visited Israel in March, made clear such strikes would be justified.

"What I have said in the past and I continue to believe is that the Israelis justifiably have to guard against the transfer of advanced weaponry to terrorist organizations like Hezbollah. We coordinate closely with the Israelis recognizing they are very close to Syria, they are very close to Lebanon," he said.

Obama's government is seeking to determine whether Syria used chemical weapons against its own people to quash a rebellion.

He said on Friday he does not envision sending U.S. troops to Syria regardless of whether chemical weapons use is determined but he has a number of other options under review.

(Reporting By Steve Holland in San Jose and Timothy Gardner in Washington; Editing by Doina Chiacu)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
blogoleum wrote:
Hizbollah is a pathetic demon.

Golda was right:
They need to love their children more than they hate Israel.

May 04, 2013 7:35pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
cautious123 wrote:
They do love their children–that’s why they’re resisting Israel’s land theft, assassinations and invasions. Get your facts straight.

May 04, 2013 8:29pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
blogoleum wrote:
Next time you attack Israel, win. Then you can complain. Yasser Arafat walked away from peace multiple times.

Neither party is without blood on its, but if you can’t live next door to them without killing them, they’re gonna come looking for you.

My heart goes out to the innocents who’ve died, but these intifadas need to end.

Brainwashing young men to die as terrorists isn’t just bad parenting, it’s evil.

May 04, 2013 10:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.