U.N. team won't be deterred if North Korea rebuffs inquiry into abuses

SYDNEY Thu May 9, 2013 1:00am EDT

Michael Kirby, an outspoken former justice of Australia's top court, listens to a question during an interview in his Sydney office May 9, 2013. REUTERS/David Gray

Michael Kirby, an outspoken former justice of Australia's top court, listens to a question during an interview in his Sydney office May 9, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/David Gray

Photo

Under the Iron Dome

Sirens sound as rockets land deep inside Israel.  Slideshow 

SYDNEY (Reuters) - U.N. investigators will seek the cooperation of North Korea as part of an inquiry into allegations of widespread human rights abuses in the country but won't be deterred if Pyongyang refuses, the head of the investigating panel said on Thursday.

Michael Kirby, an outspoken former justice of Australia's top court, was named this week as head of a three member team that will look into allegations of torture, food deprivation and labor camps that are believed to hold at least 200,000 people.

The U.N. Human Rights Council launched the one-year inquiry on March 21, hoping to gather enough information from camp survivors and other exiles to document violations that it says may amount to crimes against humanity.

Kirby said in an interview he had received hundreds of emails from human rights groups and representatives of those alleging abuse by North Korea in the day since his appointment.

Contacting North Korean authorities would be "top of the list" of priorities, he said, adding he was hopeful of a response from the government and its strongest supporters in neighboring China and Russia but that a lack of engagement would not stop the panel from completing its task.

"If they come forward - good. If they don't come forward, well, we will just get on with our job and do it within the materials and access we have. That's just common sense," said Kirby, who has previously investigated human rights abuses in Cambodia.

North Korea denies the existence of labor camps and activists do not expect it to cooperate with the investigation, having denounced it during a U.N. Human Rights Council debate.

The U.N. team would speak to North Koreans living in South Korea, Japan and Thailand, Kirby said.

"When the commission is up and running after the first of July, 2013 then we will start working through our methodology to consult and see as many as possible," he said.

Navi Pillay, U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, called in January for an international investigation into what she said may be crimes against humanity, including torture and executions of political prisoners in North Korean camps.

The council unanimously passed a resolution brought by the European Union and Japan, and backed by the United States, which set up the inquiry.

Neither North Korea's closest ally, China, nor Russia are currently members of the 47-member Geneva-based council, and thus have no vote.

Diplomats have said the inquiry sent a message that the international community was not just paying attention to North Korea's banned nuclear and ballistic missile programs.

Kirby will be joined on the committee by Sonja Biserko, a founder of the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia, and Indonesia's Marzuki Darusman, the U.N.'s current special rapporteur on North Korea.

Kirby said it was too early to discuss possible outcomes of the inquiry, such as whether it could lead to charges in the International Criminal Courts against any individuals.

"In the end, it will be the political branches of the United Nations that will be making the decisions on the report of the commission of inquiry," he said.

The inquiry is due to file an interim report by September, with a final report due by March next year.

(Editing by Dean Yates)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Universalist wrote:
One would hope that through all of this inquiry that will lead to action and forward progress will give Russia, the founder of modern gulag, a chance to renounce its purpose as debilitating to a nations very existence by citing gulag as a thing of the past that pertained to a period in history which for all intents and purposes informs us this day and age of the miniscule benefits in maintaining domestic political prisoner camps. Russia is stubborn and it seems easier to turn a black sheep white, but Russia stands to gain worldly accolades should it publicly support this Aussie led UN effort.

May 09, 2013 3:40am EDT  --  Report as abuse
nshnd wrote:
Just think about how many minor offenders America has in prison. Pot smokers don’t belong in prison for one thing. Our prisons have been turned over to private industry for profit. Better than N.K. but many, many Americans are in our prisons and it should not be. America has even executed innocent prisoners. I’m sure not standing up for N.K. but we have plenty room for improvement.

May 09, 2013 1:00pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.