Ultra-low salt intake may not boost health: U.S. panel

WASHINGTON Tue May 14, 2013 7:11pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Americans at high risk for heart problems who have been told for years to sharply cut salt from their diet may not actually benefit from ultra-low sodium diets and could even face some harm, an independent panel of health experts said on Tuesday.

The influential Institute of Medicine, in a report to U.S. health officials, reviewed the latest data on the link between salt intake and health.

While blacks, diabetics and others more likely to have heart problems are urged to slash their salt intake, the IOM review showed there was limited evidence such a diet helped, and that too little salt might increase the risk of heart trouble.

"The evidence on both the benefit and harm is not strong enough to indicate that these subgroups should be treated differently from the general U.S. population," the panel wrote.

That suggests higher-risk populations may not need such a drastic reduction of salt in their diets and that other steps to curb heart disease risk may be needed.

Americans are still consuming far too much salt, the IOM experts said. On average, U.S. adults eat about 1.5 teaspoons of salt over the course of the day, or about 3,400 milligrams.

Federal guidelines recommend that healthy people consume no more than 2,300 milligrams daily.

But the latest data calls into question whether individuals with higher risk factors for heart disease or stroke should limit their daily intake to 1,500 milligrams, as the government recommends.

Brian Strom, the panel's chairman and a public health professor at the University of Pennsylvania, said the newest studies back the known benefits of "reducing sodium from very high intake levels to moderate levels."

"But they also suggest that lowering sodium intake too much may actually increase a person's risk of some health problems," he said, including heart ailments.

Still, the studies are limited and in some cases flawed, so more research is needed, the IOM panel told the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which requested the report.

Health advocates including the American Heart Association were quick to dismiss the findings, saying the recent studies reviewed by IOM focused on sick patients and not the majority of Americans, most of whom eat too much salt.

"The bottom line for consumers is still: cut back on sodium," said the Center for Science in the Public Interest's (CSPI) Bonnie Liebman.

'IT'S PRETTY TOUGH'

The problem is not just food loaded with salt. It's also that Americans eat a lot of food that contains lower amounts of salt, such as bread and pasta, without realizing their sodium content.

Health officials have called for Americans to take various steps to cut back, such as asking for no-salt dishes in restaurants and eating more naturally low-salt foods like fruits and vegetables.

Health advocates said the IOM's review was beside the point given the high levels of sodium that still plague U.S. foods. It's almost impossible to ingest just 1,500 milligrams a day, said Liebman, director of nutrition for CSPI.

"Virtually any meal at any restaurant would give you at least half-a-day's worth of sodium, maybe a whole day's worth, maybe more," Liebman said. "You'd have to make everything from scratch. ... It's pretty tough."

Consumer groups and some lawmakers have for years called on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to set federal salt levels for food, a recommendation that the IOM backed in 2010.

In New York City, health officials have been working with restaurants and food companies to voluntarily remove salt from everyday foods.

A trio of studies published on Monday found that smaller restaurants still load their food with salt even as national chains and food manufacturers have cut back. (Read the Reuters story at reut.rs/YRGVCI)

The FDA, in a statement, said it was reviewing the IOM's report, calling it consistent with its "efforts to work toward achievable and reasonable voluntary reductions in the sodium content of the U.S. food supply."

IOM was not asked to review current federal salt intake guidelines, which were issued in 2010. U.S. health officials are expected to revise the guidelines on salt and other nutrients in 2015.

(Reporting by Susan Heavey; Editing by Michele Gershberg and Xavier Briand)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
yatiyati wrote:
Too much anything is dangerous especially sodium. Cut back as much as you can. Even then, you’ll get more than enough sodium from your diet.

Americans do not need to worry about a ultra low sodium diet. The vast majority of consume way too much sodium. A ultra low sodium diet is like the magic rainbow pony, I’ve heard of it; just never seen it.

May 14, 2013 7:59pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
JaeWww wrote:
Salt is not the problem. For most people (not all) salt intake is not a problem as long as you are drinking plenty of water.

The big problem today is lack of fiber (all processed foods) and fructose (in any form other than raw fruit).

Want to understand the real culprit? Watch Sugar: The Bitter truth a lecture by Dr. Robert Lustig, Pediatric Endocrinologist at UCSF viewable on YouTube. That’s a mind blower, no mistake. This alone will not solve all that ails, but certainly fill in the blanks on why our grandparents had far less obesity and other related disorders (diabetes, CAD, etc.). Trimming the fat didn’t help. Neither did hours at the gym. Our food is adulterated. Understanding what is really going into our body and how it affects us physiologically is the first step.

May 14, 2013 8:29pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
branchltd wrote:
How is it that it costs more to leave the salt out?

May 14, 2013 8:33pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.