LulzSec hackers "at cutting edge" of cyber crime, court told

LONDON Wed May 15, 2013 9:58am EDT

Jake Davis arrives at Southwark Crown Court in central London May 15, 2013. REUTERS/Stefan Wermuth

Jake Davis arrives at Southwark Crown Court in central London May 15, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Stefan Wermuth

LONDON (Reuters) - Four British hackers who took part in 2011 cyber-attacks on targets ranging from the CIA to Sony were audacious, arrogant men whose motivation was "anarchic self-amusement", a court heard on Wednesday.

The men, who have pleaded guilty to a variety of offences, were members of the hacking collective LulzSec that caused millions of dollars of damage to corporate and government computer networks during an online crime spree they boasted about on Twitter.

"They are at the cutting edge of a contemporary, emerging species of international criminal offending known as cyber crime," prosecutor Sandip Patel told a London court at the start of the men's sentencing hearing.

"LulzSec saw themselves as latter-day pirates," he said.

The four men being sentenced were Ryan Cleary, 21; Ryan Ackroyd, 26; Mustafa Al-Bassam, 18, and Jake Davis, 20. In their hacker days, they hid their identities behind the online monikers ViraL, Kayla, tFlow and Topiary, respectively.

"The real-life identities of the hackers were aggressively concealed. Similar protection did not extend to their victims," Patel said.

Among other attacks, the men hacked into Pentagon computers, crashed the CIA's website, stole millions of items of private individuals' data such as passwords and user names from companies including Fox or Sony and posted them online on sites such as Pirate Bay.

Their exploits, as they described them, also included hacking into News International's computer system to post a fake story, purporting to be from the Sun tabloid, announcing that owner Rupert Murdoch had committed suicide.

They also attacked the U.S. public broadcaster PBS's website, redirecting users to a fake news story reporting that the late rapper Tupac Shakur was alive.

In addition to the hacking offences to which all four have pleaded guilty, Cleary alone has pleaded guilty to charges of downloading pornographic images of babies and children.


Patel said the four men's activities were as much about self-promotion as they were about hacking, describing them as adept at getting the attention of media and of hundreds of thousands of Twitter followers and motivated by "anarchic self-amusement".

He said LulzSec was a splinter group that had evolved out of Anonymous, a bigger, shapeless "hacktivist" collective, but that LulzSec lacked the libertarian political agenda of Anonymous.

He said the LulzSec slogan was "laughing at your security since 2011" and that a press release in August 2011 had said they had acted in the way they had "just because we could".

The name LulzSec is a combination of "lulz", a distortion of the commonly used "LOL" or "laugh out loud", and security.

The alleged ringleader of LulzSec was U.S.-based Hector Xavier Monsegur, known as "Sabu", who was arrested in June 2011 but agreed to cooperate, maintaining his online persona for a time and leading the FBI to other members of the group.

Patel said the core members of LulzSec were Monsegur, Ackroyd, Al-Bassam and Davis. He said Cleary was not a core member but wanted to be.

Monsegur is awaiting sentencing in the United States, while a 24-year-old IT worker was arrested in Australia in April in connection with LulzSec.

Lawyers for the four British hackers were due to address the court about mitigating factors later on Wednesday. Judge Deborah Taylor is expected to sentence them either on Wednesday or Thursday.

(Editing by Alison Williams)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
Whittier5 wrote:
“leading edge of cyber-crime”??
It appears they are only fighting back against those usual suspects who are committing Global crime against the People.

May 15, 2013 8:49pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
AlNeuman wrote:
Less interesting than the identities or motivations of these young misguied techies is the question of why organizations like the CIA which has an annual budget in excess of $30 billion, can’t figure out how to protect its computer files from these upstarts.

Pretty pathetic if you ask me.

May 15, 2013 10:59pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
geng12 wrote:
What are you talking about, AlNeuman, since when did these bozos penetrate the CIA? Bringing down their public website doesn’t count. The real deal cyber warfare is happening between nation states – ie the Stuxnet attack against the Iranian nuclear program and state sponsored cyber espionage by multiple parties like China against the US and EU.

May 16, 2013 4:52am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.