White House releases Benghazi attack emails

WASHINGTON Wed May 15, 2013 6:56pm EDT

The U.S. Consulate in Benghazi is seen in flames on September 11, 2012. REUTERS/Esam Al-Fetori

The U.S. Consulate in Benghazi is seen in flames on September 11, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Esam Al-Fetori

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House on Wednesday released 100 pages of emails detailing discussion inside the administration over last year's deadly attacks on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya.

President Barack Obama has faced Republican criticism that his administration covered up details of the assault, especially after a news report last week said memos on the incident were edited to omit a CIA warning of an al Qaeda threat.

Senior administration officials told reporters at the White House the emails were released to clear up misinformation about the process. The emails were the basis for the controversial "talking points" memos that U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice used when discussing the attacks that killed four Americans in Benghazi.

The officials said the emails showed the talking points were based on intelligence information approved by the CIA and meant to avoid pre-judging the outcome of an FBI investigation into the September 12, 2012, attacks.

Republicans say the talking points were an attempt by the administration to portray the attacks as arising from a spontaneous protest, and not an organized terrorist assault as Obama campaigned for re-election.

(Reporting by Jeff Mason; Editing by Doina Chiacu)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (23)
AlkalineState wrote:
AM radio fogies want to know: “Were they militant extremists, or were they….extremist militants.”

Like anyone cares. A nut job with a rocket launcher is a nut job with a rocket launcher, sorry to break it to you guys.

May 15, 2013 5:59pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
totherepublic wrote:

And nut jobs protesting a video show up with rocket launchers, AKs and motors all the time right?

100 pages of emails-that is what may be 1/2 a day? WAY too little WAY too late-good try barak.

May 15, 2013 6:44pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
SanPa wrote:
I am curious as the the number of lives that would have been saved had the original conversation included the label “terrorist”. My sense is that said disclosure would not have saved lives or made the event any less tragic.

May 15, 2013 6:51pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.