Republicans advance bill to tie student loan rates to markets

WASHINGTON Thu May 16, 2013 5:58pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republicans in control of the House Education and the Workforce Committee voted on Thursday to advance legislation tying student loan interest rates to the financial markets, a plan they said would give borrowers a better sense of how much they must repay.

Currently, interest rates on subsidized Stafford loans are set by the government. The rates are due to double on July 1 to 6.8 percent from 3.4 percent, and while lawmakers across the aisle agree that an increase should be averted, they disagree on how to prevent it.

Republicans on the committee rejected amendments by Democrats to maintain the current rates for another two years.

Under the Republican plan, subsidized and unsubsidized Stafford loans would be recalculated every year and pegged to 10-year Treasury notes, plus 2.5 percentage points.

The bill will now move to the full Republican-controlled House. It is unclear if it will get much traction in the Democrat-led Senate, which is working on an alternative plan to freeze rates at the current 3.4 percent until 2015.

Lawmakers have recently expressed growing concerns about American students' loan debt, which according to the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau now exceeds $1 trillion. The average student borrower owes about $27,000, and delinquency rates are increasing as new graduates struggle to find jobs.

The bill introduced by Republicans John Kline of Minnesota and Virginia Foxx of North Carolina is similar to a proposal by President Barack Obama in his budget proposal, but includes a 8.5 percent cap on loan rates.

"Student borrowers shouldn't have to ride the roller coaster of political largesse wondering every year whether Congress will intervene in time to adjust their rates," Foxx said.

Democrats on the committee opposed the bill, saying it puts students and families at risk of paying more in the future.

"Our students and families deserve better than this bait-and-switch scheme we're voting on today," said California Representative George Miller, the senior Democrat on the committee.

"A low-income, four-year borrower enrolling in college next year would pay more interest on her student loans under the Republican proposal than she would if we took no action," he said.

The non-partisan Congressional Research Service estimates that under the Republican plan, a student who borrows the maximum amount of subsidized and unsubsidized Stafford loans over five years would pay $14,430 in interest. If rates were allowed to double on July 1, a student would pay $12,598, compared with $7,965 if rates don't double.

(Reporting By Elvina Nawaguna; Editing by Philip Barbara)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Burns0011 wrote:
Bullshit. This is Congress being greedy, and trying to force government assistance to be identical to the private market.

This is Congress looking out for big banking, and not investing in future generations of workers, scientists, technicians, engineers.

May 16, 2013 12:13am EDT  --  Report as abuse
onlyif wrote:
“The rates are due to double on July 1 to 6.8 percent from 3.4 percent” – though i know very little, isn’t that kinda like when people took out a home mortgage on a 2 year teaser rate… then when the interest rate went up they could no longer afford to repay…. sucks to be a student in the US…

May 18, 2013 6:35pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus