Citi settles U.S. suit over $3.5 billion in mortgage securities

NEW YORK Tue May 28, 2013 5:55pm EDT

Passersby walk in front of a Citibank branch in New York, October 16, 2012. REUTERS/Keith Bedford

Passersby walk in front of a Citibank branch in New York, October 16, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Keith Bedford

Related Topics

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Citigroup Inc (C.N) has reached a settlement with a federal agency that had accused the bank of misleading Fannie Mae (FNMA.OB) and Freddie Mac (FMCC.OB) into buying $3.5 billion of mortgage-backed securities.

The settlement with the Federal Housing Finance Agency was disclosed in a filing on Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Manhattan, where a series of related cases by the agency against Wall Street banks are pending.

The filing did not disclose the terms of the deal. FHFA spokeswoman Stefanie Johnson said the settlement was "satisfactory" but declined to say how much Citi would pay.

FHFA is active in settlement discussions with other banks that were subjects of these lawsuits, she said.

Danielle Romero-Apsilos, a spokeswoman for Citigroup, declined to discuss the terms of the settlement but said the bank was "pleased to put this matter behind us."

The accord marks the second so far out of 18 securities fraud cases the FHFA filed against banks in 2011 over more than $200 billion in mortgage-backed securities sold to Fannie and Freddie.

The FHGA settled a separate lawsuit in January, in which it had accused General Electric Co (GE.N) of misleading Freddie Mac into buying $549 million worth of securities. Terms of that deal were also confidential.

The FHFA's settlement with Citigroup followed a major setback for the banks when the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals refused to reverse a ruling allowing a similar case against UBS to move forward.

The ruling upheld a May 2012 decision by U.S. District Judge Denise Cote rejecting UBS's argument the FHFA waited too long before suing the bank. The appellate court's reasoning extended to the 14 cases before Cote, including Citigroup's.

The case is Federal Housing Finance Agency v. Citigroup Inc., et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 11-06196.

(Reporting by Nate Raymond in New York; Editing by Leslie Adler and David Gregorio)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
RLinCO wrote:
Danielle Romero-Apsilos, a spokeswoman for Citigroup, declined to discuss the terms of the settlement but said the bank was “pleased to put this matter behind us.”

….(but forgot to add)….”and that no one is going to jail over this one, either”!!!

May 29, 2013 11:50am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.