U.S. soldier at center of WikiLeaks case set to go on trial Monday

WASHINGTON Sat Jun 1, 2013 7:01am EDT

U.S. Army Private First Class Bradley Manning (R) arrives at the courthouse for a motion hearing at Fort Meade in Maryland, May 21, 2013. REUTERS/Jose Luis Magana

U.S. Army Private First Class Bradley Manning (R) arrives at the courthouse for a motion hearing at Fort Meade in Maryland, May 21, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Jose Luis Magana

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The American soldier accused of the biggest leak of classified information in U.S. history, which prosecutors say put lives at risk, goes on trial on Monday in a case that raises questions about the limits of secrecy and openness in the Internet era.

Private First Class Bradley Manning, 25, is charged with providing more than 700,000 documents to WikiLeaks, an anti-secrecy website.

He said the move was intended to spark renewed debate on U.S. military action. But the government says the leaks damaged national security and endangered American lives. He faces a possible life sentence if convicted.

The military trial at Fort Meade, Maryland, about 30 miles northeast of Washington, is expected to run until at least late August. Prosecutors have said they expect to call more than 100 witnesses.

Civil liberties groups say the court-martial has been shrouded in secrecy and has had a chilling effect on whistleblowers.

Manning faces 21 counts, including the most serious one of aiding the enemy, as well as prosecution under the Espionage Act of 1917.

"It's probably the most dramatic example of the administration's use of the Espionage Act to prosecute leaks of information to the media," said Elizabeth Goitein, co-director of the Brennan Center for Justice's Liberty and National Security Program.

"It's quite dramatic, and the government will say that it's proportionate to the crime."

'CLEAR CONSCIENCE'

Manning, an intelligence analyst, was arrested in May 2010 while serving in Iraq. He was charged with downloading intelligence documents, diplomatic cables and combat videos and forwarding them to WikiLeaks, which began releasing the information that year.

Manning testified in February that he had released the files to spark a domestic debate on the military and on foreign policy in general.

"I take full responsibility for my actions," he said at the time. "I felt I accomplished something that would allow me to have a clear conscience."

One of the leaked U.S. military videos showed a 2007 attack by Apache helicopters that killed a dozen people in Baghdad. They included two Reuters news staff, photographer Namir Noor-Eldeen and driver Saeed Chmagh.

The judge in the case, Colonel Denise Lind, said last month she would close parts of the trial to the public to protect classified material. Rather than face a jury, Manning has chosen to have Lind decide his case.

Manning pleaded guilty in court in February to 10 lesser charges that he was the source of the WikiLeaks release. But prosecutors rejected the pleas and are pursuing the original charges.

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has taken refuge in the Ecuadorean Embassy in London since June 2012 to avoid extradition to Sweden for alleged sex crimes.

Nathan Fuller, a spokesman for the Bradley Manning Support Network, called the case a harbinger for U.S. media because the trial means posting government documents on the Internet could be construed as aiding the enemy.

"It's already chilled a lot of whistleblowers, a lot of soldiers don't want to talk to the press anymore. A lot of reporters are saying their sources are drying up," he said.

(Reporting by Ian Simpson; Editing by Scott Malone and Xavier Briand)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
NEWSTIME2010 wrote:
Julian Assange should have the freedom to Human Rights make a comment here, and Now, prior to the Trial on Monday!
Mr Purple Heart could arrange that from Singapore.
China is smiling like Mona Lisa.

Jun 01, 2013 7:46am EDT  --  Report as abuse
crittertron wrote:
Thousands of soldiers have spoken out publicly about the terrible things they’ve seen America do in other countries, Manning just did it with documented proof. There is no crime here … at most there is just a violation of already loose regulations that should ammount to nothing more than a slap on the wrist but we put him in solitary for 18 months. I’d say time served is already too harsh.

Jun 01, 2013 8:33am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Ralphooo wrote:
I am glad to see that Reuters is covering the Bradley Manning trial, and, if this article is an indication, will be reporting the facts and developments in a neutral style.

Manning’s story can be fruitfully contrasted with that of Daniel Ellsberg, a former United States military analyst, who released comparable materials in 1971, leading to the well-known “Pentagon Papers” case.

Obama, who had been considered by many on both sides of the aisle to be a strong liberal, has proved surprisingly aggressive in fostering secrecy — including use of the Espionage Act to prosecute leakers and whistle blowers. A number of commentators on the political left have anguished over an apparent contradiction in the Obama administration’s policies, between support for civil liberties, and what some call excessive secrecy.

Jun 01, 2013 8:41am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.