EU justice chief seeks answers on U.S. data spying

BRUSSELS Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:40pm EDT

European Union Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding addresses the European Parliament during a debate on the constitutional situation in Hungary in Strasbourg, April 17, 2013. REUTERS/Vincent Kessler

European Union Justice Commissioner Viviane Reding addresses the European Parliament during a debate on the constitutional situation in Hungary in Strasbourg, April 17, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Vincent Kessler

Related Topics

Photo

Under the Iron Dome

Sirens sound as rockets land deep inside Israel.  Slideshow 

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - The European Union's chief justice official has written to the U.S. attorney general demanding an explanation for the collection of foreign nationals' data through its Prism spy program.

In a letter seen by Reuters, the European commissioner for justice and fundamental rights, Viviane Reding, said she had serious concerns about the possibility that U.S. authorities had accessed European citizens' data on a vast scale.

Reding has pushed hard for stronger privacy rules in Europe throughout her mandate. In 2012, she sought to introduce measures that would have set up barriers for foreign judicial authorities to access data about European citizens.

But EU officials say the proposals were diluted by her counterparts in the European Commission, the EU executive, because of concerns such laws would strain relations with the United States at a time when the EU was preparing for talks on a free-trade deal with Washington.

"I would request that you provide me with explanations and clarifications on the Prism program, other U.S. programs involving data collection and search, and laws under which such programs may be authorized," Reding wrote to Attorney General Eric Holder.

U.S. officials have confirmed the existence of a secret program to draw data from the Internet, code-named Prism, which according to documents leaked to the Washington Post and Britain's Guardian newspaper has given them access to data from firms such as Google, Facebook and Skype.

Reding has tried to make it more difficult for U.S. authorities to obtain data from European telecoms and technology companies by introducing stricter requirements such as the approval from a judicial authority.

"In-house people didn't want to create any possible tension with the U.S.," an EU official said, referring to opposition inside the European Commission to Reding's proposals in 2012.

Holder and Reding will meet in Dublin on Friday at a scheduled ministerial gathering.

DETAILED QUESTIONS

In her letter, Reding asks Holder to explain whether EU citizens were targeted under Prism, how broad U.S. access to the data would have been and how EU companies and citizens can appeal against the monitoring of their private correspondence.

EU officials have for several years asked the United States to explain how laws such as the Patriot Act and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Amendment Act affect EU citizens and companies. The European Parliament, in particular, has become vocal about limiting data sharing and protecting privacy.

Since 2011 the European Commission has tried to negotiate a transatlantic data protection agreement that would limit U.S. access to European data.

The talks have stalled partly over the issue of what rights EU citizens had on U.S. soil, a commission official told Reuters earlier this week.

EU officials also are debating whether data protection should be included in negotiations for an EU-U.S. free-trade deal on which formal talks are expected to begin next month.

European businesses have warned that without legal certainty, technologies which rely on data protection such as cloud computing will not be able to grow in Europe.

Companies considering adopting cloud technology still cite security as their biggest concern and European officials say they are aware that Europe's cloud market hinges on privacy.

"The storage of the data in the foreign servers and related legal uncertainty constitutes a real impediment," a Commission official said.

Lobby groups in Brussels say they need to know which set of laws - EU or U.S. legislation - they should follow.

(Reporting By Claire Davenport; Editing by Luke Baker, Raissa Kasolowsky and Bill Trott)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
MassResident wrote:
Ah, yes. I was waiting for this. Spying on your own population is OK in dictatorships but spying on your allies is OK with no one. The Fourth Amendment may not have been intended to include foreign nationals as part of “the people” but I am pretty sure our treaties with our allies require us to grant their nationals and their property the protection of American law. The NSA’s claim that it only reads the Emails of non Americans was a diplomatic blunder of epic proportions.

There is a reason the CIA was forbidden to operate within the US. Failure to follow your own laws on your own territory is an act of anarchy and the damage to our reputation and commerce is going to be very serious.

Jun 12, 2013 7:51pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
NokiaFans wrote:
The rich and the powerful are afraid of their secrets being leak out!

Jun 13, 2013 8:01am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.