'Desperate father' spray paints British queen's portrait

LONDON Thu Jun 13, 2013 11:25am EDT

A woman walks outside Westminster Abbey which was closed after a man defaced a painting of Britain's Queen Elizabeth hanging inside in London, June 13, 2013. REUTERS/Paul Hackett

A woman walks outside Westminster Abbey which was closed after a man defaced a painting of Britain's Queen Elizabeth hanging inside in London, June 13, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Paul Hackett


Power celebs

The most powerful celebrities as ranked by Forbes.  Slideshow 

LONDON (Reuters) - A man defaced a portrait of Britain's Queen Elizabeth with paint at London's Westminster Abbey on Thursday, with a campaign group for fathers' rights saying he was one of its members making a "desperate" plea to the monarch for help.

The painting of the 87-year-old monarch, "The Coronation Theatre: Portrait of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II" by London-based artist Ralph Heimans, had been part of a display marking the 60 years since the queen's coronation in 1953.

"In an incident at lunchtime today, a visitor to the Abbey sprayed paint on the Ralph Heimans portrait of the queen presently on display in the Chapter House," an Abbey spokesman said.

"Until work can be done to remedy the damage, it will, very regrettably, not be possible to have the painting on public view."

London's Metropolitan Police said security guards had detained a suspect at the scene. Officers arrested the 41-year-old man on suspicion of criminal damage and he has been taken to a central London police station for questioning.

Fathers4Justice (F4J), a group which supports divorced fathers seeking greater access to their children, said one of its members had carried out the attack to bring attention to his plight ahead of Father's Day on Sunday.

"We understand that a desperate father belonging to Fathers4Justice has attempted to write the word 'help' on a portrait of the queen in Westminster Abbey," the group said in a statement, adding it was not directly involved.

F4J named the man as Tim Haries from Doncaster in northern England. "Tim Haries has lost all contact with his children and felt he had nothing to lose by appealing directly to the queen for help by spraying his plea onto her portrait," said Campaign Director Jolly Stanesby.

F4J gained notoriety in 2004 when a campaigner dressed as Batman climbed the queen's Buckingham Palace residence and another threw purple flour bombs at former Prime Minister Tony Blair while he addressed parliament.

In 2006, two of its members were arrested after scaling London's Westminster Abbey with a crucified dummy Jesus Christ. Earlier that year, the campaign group said it had decided to disband after reports that police had foiled a plot to kidnap Blair's five-year-old son Leo.

A new official campaign group reformed some years later.

Last week, the queen and senior members of the royal family attended a service of celebration at the Abbey to mark the diamond anniversary of her coronation.

(Editing by Raissa Kasolowsky)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
GA_Chris wrote:
You mean fathers actually have rights in this sexiest world?

Jun 13, 2013 2:19pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Engineer_Bob wrote:
Yes fathers have the right to Pay, Pay, Pay but not to see their kids.

Jun 13, 2013 3:23pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
JamVee wrote:
What a totally idiotic way to try to garner sympathy for a “cause”! This guy’s child is probably better off without the influences of a “nut case” father.

I actually support this cause, but this certainly wont help anything. I’d make him pay for the repairs, and do some “slammer” time too.

Jun 14, 2013 11:58am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.