Ethiopia ratifies Nile treaty in snub to Egypt

ADDIS ABABA Thu Jun 13, 2013 9:06am EDT

Birds fly past as boats are seen over the Egyptian Nile River in Cairo June 6, 2013. REUTERS/Amr Abdallah Dalsh

Birds fly past as boats are seen over the Egyptian Nile River in Cairo June 6, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Amr Abdallah Dalsh

Related Topics

ADDIS ABABA (Reuters) - Ethiopia's parliament unanimously ratified on Thursday a treaty that strips Egypt of its right to the lion's share of the Nile river waters, raising the political temperature in a dispute between Cairo and Addis Ababa over the construction of a dam.

The parliament's move follows days of irate exchanges between two of Africa's most populous nations over Ethiopia's new hydroelectric plant, which Egypt fears will reduce a water supply vital for its 84 million people.

Egyptian President Mohamed Mursi said on Monday he did not want "war" but would keep "all options open", prompting Ethiopia to say it was ready to defend its $4.7 billion Great Renaissance Dam near the border with Sudan.

Six Nile basin countries including Ethiopia have signed a deal effectively stripping Cairo of its veto, which is based in colonial-era treaties, over dam projects on the Nile, source of nearly all Egypt's water.

Ethiopia's late leader Meles Zenawi had delayed parliamentary ratification until Egypt elected a new government.

"Most of the upstream countries have approved it through their parliaments. We delayed it as a gesture of goodwill to the people of Egypt until a formal elected government was in place," Ethiopian government spokesman Bereket Simon told Reuters.

"We have a principled stance on the construction of dams. We are determined to see our projects brought to completion."

Another government spokesman, Shimeles Kemal, said Ethiopia's 547-seat legislature had voted to "incorporate the treaty into domestic law".


Egyptian Foreign Minister Mohamed Kamel Amr is expected to travel to Addis Ababa on Sunday for talks about the dam, though Ethiopia's foreign ministry has said there can be no question of suspending construction.

An Ethiopian foreign ministry spokesman has said the talks with Egypt are "in the spirit of Ethiopian interests".

The African Union has urged both sides to hold talks to resolve the row.

Under a 1929 pact, Egypt is entitled to 55.5 billion cubic meters a year of the Nile's flow of around 84 billion cubic meters.

But, along with other upstream neighbors such as Kenya and Sudan, Ethiopia argues that this pact is outdated. Ethiopia has also dismissed the talk of military action as "psychological warfare".

Officials in Addis Ababa say a technical analysis compiled by experts from Ethiopia, Sudan and Egypt provides assurances to downstream nations that the dam being built by an Italian firm will not have a negative impact on the river's water levels.

(Reporting by Aaron Maasho, editing by Gareth Jones)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (1)
Referring back to the ancient history, GOD has made the Nile River a great blessing for all the ten nations but more so for the downstream countries that nature has deprived high rainfalls. The six or so nations that have revolted against the age long treaty should take their time to look at both sides of the coin. It is a high time all the nations collaborate in implementing IWRM among the member state and establish an institution and funds dedicated to safeguard a comprehensive system of management of the entire Nile catchment for the benefit of the current and future generations. Please Let not individual state interest override the overall/collective goal. Let’s all be guided by the International law on Trans boundary waters and desist from Strangling the disadvantaged member states.
Give dialogue and professionalism a chance

Jun 15, 2013 4:51pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.