Mandela getting better but remains 'serious'

JOHANNESBURG Sun Jun 16, 2013 1:32pm EDT

Rope access technicians work to complete a huge portrait of former South African President Nelson Mandela on the windows of the Civic Centre building in Cape Town, June 15, 2013. REUTERS/Mark Wessels

Rope access technicians work to complete a huge portrait of former South African President Nelson Mandela on the windows of the Civic Centre building in Cape Town, June 15, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Mark Wessels

JOHANNESBURG (Reuters) - Nelson Mandela continues to recover in hospital from a lung infection but remains in a serious condition, South African President Jacob Zuma said on Sunday.

Mandela has been in a Pretoria hospital for a week, the fourth time the 94-year-old former president and anti-Apartheid leader has been admitted to hospital since December.

"We are grateful that he continues to get better," Zuma said. "Over the last two days, although he remains serious, his doctors have stated that his improvement has been sustained."

Zuma was addressing a gathering for Youth Day in eMadadeni in the KwaZulu-Natal province in remembrance of the 1976 Soweto youth uprisings against apartheid.

Mandela's repeated bouts of illness have reinforced a creeping realization among South Africa's 53 million people that they will one day have to say goodbye to their first black president.

Mandela, popularly known by his clan name "Madiba", has a history of lung problems dating back to his time at the windswept Robben Island prison camp near Cape Town. He was released from prison in 1990 after 27 years behind bars and was president from 1994 to 1999.

(Reporting by Olivia Kumwenda; Editing by Jon Boyle)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Midnight1 wrote:
Why aren’t they treating this with UV Blood Therapy? It isn’t invasive, has a track record of high success with lung infections, including pneumonia, has over 80 years of documented success, is FDA approved in the US, and has zero side effects. Nothing to lose and a lot to gain, and it is inexpensive to boot. Oh, that’s it. it’s not profitable, it just kills infections within one to four treatments and a few hundreds bucks each.
Sorry Mr. Mandela, we can only cure you if the price is right.

Jun 16, 2013 8:38am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus