An aerial view shows the pack of riders as they cycle along the coast during the 145,5 km third stage of the centenary Tour de France from Ajaccio to Calvi, on the French Mediterranean island of Corsica July 1, 2013. REUTERS/Pascal Pochard-Casabianca/Pool

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Egypt's Mursi protests

Egyptian President Mohamed Mursi clings to office as protesters demand that he resign.  Slideshow 

Photo

Obama in Africa

President Obama is seeking to build a new economic partnership with Africa at the end of a tour of the fast-growing continent.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

G8 urges Syria peace talks as fighting flares in north

1 of 8. A Free Syrian Army fighter looks toward a mirror to monitor forces loyal to Syria's President Bashar al-Assad in Aleppo's al-Sayyid Ali neighborhood, June 18, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Muzaffar Salman

ENNISKILLEN, Northern Ireland/BEIRUT | Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:34pm EDT

ENNISKILLEN, Northern Ireland/BEIRUT (Reuters) - Differences between Russia and the West mean an international peace conference on Syria is now unlikely before August, a source at a meeting of Group of Eight leaders said on Tuesday as surging government forces brought heavy fighting to Aleppo.

World leaders called for peace talks to be held as soon as possible to end the war in Syria but made no mention of a date for the international conference, which had been due to be held in Geneva next month.

In Aleppo, several fronts in Syria's biggest city that had been relatively quiet for some time were now experiencing heavy fighting as government troops have gained ground this month, according to an opposition monitoring group.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, a backer of Bashar al-Assad, appeared isolated at a summit of the Group of Eight in Northern Ireland, resisting attempts to persuade him to moderate his support for the Syrian president.

U.S. President Barack Obama, moving since last week towards arming the rebels fighting to oust Assad, said it was important to build a strong opposition that could function after the Syrian leader loses power.

"We remain committed to achieving a political solution to the crisis based on a vision for a united, inclusive and democratic Syria," G8 leaders said, according to a copy of the final communique seen by Reuters.

Peace talks envisaged for July were unlikely to be held before August, according to one source at the summit.

The communique made no mention of Assad, who Western leaders have said in the past said must step down as part of a resolution. Russia had said that any such reference to Assad's fate in the document would not be acceptable.

G8 leaders also called on the Syrian authorities and the opposition to commit to destroying all organizations affiliated with al Qaeda. Members of the militant group and allied Islamist fighters have been in action alongside the rebels.

Obama and his allies want Assad to cede power while Putin, whose rhetoric has become increasingly anti-Western since he was re-elected last year, believes that would be disastrous at a time when no clear transition plan exists.

Russia, which has given Assad diplomatic cover as well as weapons, urged the West to think "three or four times" before going ahead with plans to arm the rebels.

Moscow could not accept that Assad had used chemical weapons against the rebels, an allegation that had tipped Washington's hand in deciding to arm the anti-Assad fighters, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said.

FIGHTING IN NORTH

As peace efforts have faltered and arms have flowed into rebel hands, heavy fighting on the northern front lines in and around Aleppo has resumed. Government forces are seeking to build on battlefield gains further south.

Those backing the rebels - including Britain, France, Turkey and Arab countries as well as the United States - were driven to intensify support in recent weeks to rescue the rebellion after Assad's forces scored important military gains.

Just a few months ago, Western countries thought Assad's days were numbered. But last month he received the open support of thousands of fighters from Hezbollah, the powerful Iran-backed Shi'ite militia in neighboring Lebanon, which helped him capture the strategic town of Qusair from the rebels this month.

Rami Abdelrahman, head of the anti-Assad Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, said there were clashes in the eastern Sakhour neighborhood of Aleppo as well as in the Old City, which sits between government and rebel-held territory.

An opposition activist said rebels and government forces were fighting in the alleyways of Aleppo's historic Old City.

The Observatory also reported clashes in Damascus, Homs, Hama, Deraa and the eastern city of Deir al-Zor.

In Idlib province, in the north west, a rocket hit the house of a prominent religious figure who is known to support pro-Assad militia, killing 20 people, the Observatory said.

In Lebanon, militants supporting opposing sides in Syria's civil war clashed in the southern city of Sidon on Tuesday, killing one person, a security source said, in a city where divisions have been simmering for months.

The recent upsurge of fighting has turned Syria's war into a sectarian conflict between Sunni Muslim rebels and members of Assad's Alwaite sect, an offshoot of Shi'ite Islam, and their Shi'ite Hezbollah allies.

Lebanon on Tuesday accused Assad's forces of driving Sunni Muslims across the border into its territory.

Syrian forces had committed what was "tantamount to ethnic cleansing next to the Syrian-Lebanese border", Wael Abu Faour, the Lebanese caretaker minister for social affairs, told Reuters.

"(Assad) is trying to displace all the Sunnis to Lebanon and this is why I expect to have more displaced people," he said.

The United Nations says 93,000 people have been killed in Syria and 1.6 million Syrians have fled abroad. Lebanon, the smallest of Syria's neighbors, has taken in more than half a million Syrian refugees.

(Writing by Giles Elgood; Editing by Peter Graff)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
Fromkin wrote:
“You’re close to a seven to one position on Syria and clearly Putin doesn’t hold back with his views,” the source said, saying the peace conference sponsored by the United States and Russia was now unlikely to take place in July as planned.”

Why? Here is the answer by Russia’s Foreign ministry:

“We categorically oppose … affirmations that the conference should become a kind of public act of capitulation by the government delegation, with the subsequent handover of power in Syria to the opposition,”

The US intention in organizing this conference was to present Russia, Syria, and Iran with a fait accompli by pressuring the Syrian government to transfer power to a makeshift transitional government fabricated by the washington and therefore achieving regime-change. Qysair changed Washington’s calculations. After the fall of Qusayr, rebels are no longer in a postion to pose a serious threat to Damascus and make outlandish demands as a result. Which explains why Western governments are now dragging their feet to the conference they requested themselves. They are in a weak position.

Jun 18, 2013 11:26am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Slammy wrote:
@Fromkin

“rebels are no longer in a postion to pose a serious threat to Damascus”
Ok, so the car bombs, attacks on police stations and the huge bomb attack three days ago on the Mezzeh military airport do not count, right? This just what peace in Damascus looks like.

A year ago, I think a peace deal might ave been doable. Now, I think too much blood has been spilled and the nation must either live in anarchy, be split up or have a heavy outside military force stationed to keep the peace. But all this talk about Russia reminded me of how they solved the Georgia conflict in 2008 without the help of the United Nations. A similar arrangement in Syria might work today. Why not?

Jun 18, 2013 11:43am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Fromkin wrote:
“Ok, so the car bombs, attacks on police stations and the huge bomb attack three days ago on the Mezzeh military airport do not count, right? This just what peace in Damascus looks like.”

Your reasoning is like that of someone determined to rob a place. It’s very fixated and reductionist. You seem to take the trees for the forest and your understanding of political nuances is limited.

Damascus in the context of my post means the Syrian government, Assad’s power. Syria is ruled through and by Damascus just like the US is ruled through and by Washington. A threat to Washigton doesn’t mean a bomb in washington mall or street but a systemic attack that threatens the US government and, by extention, the country as a whole.

In the same context car bombs, attacks on police and suicide attacks in Damascus are not serius threats to Assad’s power or the Syrian govermnet but coward terrorist acts. It’s happening everyday in irak. Just today 31 people were killed.

“…..But all this talk about Russia reminded me of how they solved the Georgia conflict in 2008 without the help of the United Nations. A similar arrangement in Syria might work today. Why not?

Again you fail to grasp political nuances. Here is why.

A similar arrangement would leave Assad in Power just like Saakashvily remained in power. Wouldn’t it?

Russia never pursued for regime-change in Georgia. it never pushed to get to Tbilisi but the US wants to push into Damascus.

South Ossetia and Abkhazia were already autonomous entities when Georgia attacked them. They had a special arrangement just like the Kurds in Irak. Besides, Saakashvili tried to fly too close to the sun and burned his wings. He was pushed to test Russia, and he, and those who pushed him, learned a lesson.

Russia can not accept NATO forces in Georgia just like the US can not accept Russia forces in Cuba or mexico border. That’s realpolitik. Let’s not get lost trying to go deep into it. The bottom line is the Syrian situation is not similar to South Ossetia and Abkhazia.

If it was that easy for The U.S. to solve the Syrian issue without the UN, why have it been trying like a devil to get a UN authorization for almost three years? It would have been easier to assemble a coalition of the willing and just do it like in Irak or like Russia did in Georgia as you say. And I am sure had it done it we would not be having this debate by now.

The truth is the US is trying to engage in a blatant act of aggression which is against the UN charter and the international law so it needs the UN cover. Without UN cover it clear the mission will be unaccomplished.

Jun 18, 2013 1:31pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.