More U.S. senators concerned by Shuanghui-Smithfield deal

WASHINGTON Fri Jun 21, 2013 5:47pm EDT

A painted pig stands on the lawn of Smithfield Foods executive offices in Smithfield, Virginia May 30, 2013. REUTERS/Rich-Joseph Facun

A painted pig stands on the lawn of Smithfield Foods executive offices in Smithfield, Virginia May 30, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Rich-Joseph Facun

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - More U.S. senators on Friday raised concerns about a Chinese company's plan to buy U.S. pork company Smithfield Foods Inc SFD.N, particularly in light of restrictions that China continues to place on imports of U.S. meat.

"This review must be thorough and take into account the full range of national security interests," the top Democrat and Republican on the Senate Finance Committee said in a letter to U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew and U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman.

"In particular, we urge that due consideration be given to the impact of the transaction on food safety in the United States," added Senators Max Baucus, a Montana Democrat and the committee's chairman, and Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican.

That echoed a demand made on Thursday by 15 of the 20 members of the Senate Agriculture Committee.

Chinese meat company Shuanghui International hopes to buy Smithfield, the world's largest pork producer and processor, for $4.7 billion in what would be the biggest takeover of a U.S. company by a Chinese firm.

The companies, out of what lawyers said was "an abundance of caution," filed the proposed deal with the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) which reviews foreign investment for any potential threat to national security.

Many CFIUS experts believe it is unlikely the Obama administration will decide that Chinese investment in the U.S. food sector is a national security threat.

"I think the Chinese will bring home the bacon," said Timothy Keeler, a former U.S. Treasury and trade official who now advises companies with deals that go before CFIUS.

In a statement on Thursday, Smithfield said it welcomed a full review of the deal and would continue to cooperate with the administration and Congress in that effort.

"We believe the proposed combination does not present any national security concerns, is good for U.S. farmers and agriculture and will advance U.S.-China relations," a spokeswoman for Smithfield said.

Baucus and Hatch said the proposed sale threw a spotlight on longtime Chinese restrictions on U.S. meat, and urged the Obama administration to aggressively push back on those measures.

"The purchase of Smithfield - the largest pork producer in the world - is difficult to square with China's restrictive policies that effectively ban U.S. pork," the senators said.

China currently bans imports of pork containing any residue of ractopamine, a feed additive used widely in the United States with backing from the Codex Alimentarius, the international food safety standards body.

It also blocks imports of almost all U.S. beef because of mad cow disease concerns, despite a finding by the World Animal Health Organization that U.S. beef is safe.

"As a result, while Chinese meat producers are free to bid on U.S. companies accounting for a significant share of U.S. pork production, our producers remain shut out of the important Chinese market," the senators said.

(Reporting by Doug Palmer; Editing by Eric Walsh)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (9)
chekovmerlin wrote:
The Chinese don’t believe in free trade. They use that as an excuse to elbow their way into the world. If they won’t open up markets to us, we shouldn’t allow them to buy our companies.

Jun 21, 2013 9:06pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
AdamSmith wrote:
The senators don’t care that the H1B Visa program is destroying the American engineering profession, because they don’t care about the American middle class.

Here, they are worried about the American wealthy special corporate farming interests, mostly owned by people who inherited vast holdings, and who don’t really know the meaning of real, hard work.

Here, by questioning this purchase of the pork producer, the senators are looking out for the interests of wealthy corporate interests, wealthy people whose interests are threatened by competition.

The wealthy class of America is so quick to bring in foreign immigrant workers to drive down agricultural labor rates, the American citizen workers be cursed, condemned and betrayed every day.

The immigration bill pending before congress today has a vast, expanded “guest agricultural worker” program, illustrating the low regard with which the senate protects the American worker.

Jun 21, 2013 9:43pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
MikeBarnett wrote:
Smithfield has been phasing out use of the food additive that China and other countries oppose, so there will be no problem with pork sales to China. The pork is not going to US consumers, so the safety of US food is not in danger. China will save US jobs; US standards of food safety will be enforced by US food inspectors; so both countries will win.

Jun 22, 2013 12:50pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.