Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Gettysburg's 150th

Re-enactors and visitors mark the 150th anniversary of the Battle of Gettysburg, often described as the turning point of the Civil War.  Slideshow 

Photo

Gay pride parades

Revelers celebrate in gay pride parades around the world, on the heels of twin victories on same-sex marriage in the U.S. Supreme Court.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Square roots? Scientists say plants are good at math

Spring buds are silhouetted against the rising full moon in Washington, March 19, 2011.REUTERS/Hyungwon Kang

Spring buds are silhouetted against the rising full moon in Washington, March 19, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Hyungwon Kang

LONDON | Sun Jun 23, 2013 12:09am EDT

LONDON (Reuters) - Plants do complex arithmetic calculations to make sure they have enough food to get them through the night, new research published in journal eLife shows.

Scientists at Britain's John Innes Centre said plants adjust their rate of starch consumption to prevent starvation during the night when they are unable to feed themselves with energy from the sun.

They can even compensate for an unexpected early night.

"This is the first concrete example in a fundamental biological process of such a sophisticated arithmetic calculation," mathematical modeler Martin Howard of John Innes Centre (JIC) said.

During the night, mechanisms inside the leaf measure the size of the starch store and estimate the length of time until dawn. Information about time comes from an internal clock, similar to the human body clock.

"The capacity to perform arithmetic calculation is vital for plant growth and productivity," JIC metabolic biologist Alison Smith said.

"Understanding how plants continue to grow in the dark could help unlock new ways to boost crop yield."

(Reporting by Nigel Hunt; editing by Keiron Henderson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
exScientist wrote:
Ludicrous claims like this, which are more shameless PR than anything else, do nothing to advance the cause of science – and uncritical reporting by the scientifically illiterate media compounds the problem.

Of course plants do not do arithmetic any more than a dog catching a ball does calculus. It is interesting and possibly newsworthy that plants have been observed to have evolved such an effective mechanism for regulating starch consumption; there’s no need to spoil it with puerile anthropomorphism.

Jun 23, 2013 5:46am EDT  --  Report as abuse
LanceSmith wrote:
“”This is the first concrete example in a fundamental biological process of such a sophisticated arithmetic calculation,” mathematical modeler Martin Howard of John Innes Centre (JIC) said.”

Well speaking as a computational chemist, this sounds like a load of nonsense. Methinks the folks in the field of computational biology would also find this statement problematic. Technically, EVERY biological process could be thought of as a product of a sophisticated arithmetic calculation. Actually, it is our algorithms that mimic or model life. If this guy is really a modeler, I doubt he would have said this.

Jun 23, 2013 4:39pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
iantresman wrote:
Nonsense. Plants do not do maths, any more than people do maths when trying to catch a ball moving on a certain trajectory.

Jun 24, 2013 7:41am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.