An aerial view shows the pack of riders as they cycle along the coast during the 145,5 km third stage of the centenary Tour de France from Ajaccio to Calvi, on the French Mediterranean island of Corsica July 1, 2013. REUTERS/Pascal Pochard-Casabianca/Pool

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Egypt's Mursi protests

Egyptian President Mohamed Mursi clings to office as protesters demand that he resign.  Slideshow 

Photo

Obama in Africa

President Obama is seeking to build a new economic partnership with Africa at the end of a tour of the fast-growing continent.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

U.S. approves two new Newport cigarettes in first use of new powers

Related Topics

A view shows the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) logo at the lobby of its headquarters in Silver Spring, Maryland August 14, 2012. Picture taken August 14, 2012. REUTERS/Jason Reed

A view shows the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) logo at the lobby of its headquarters in Silver Spring, Maryland August 14, 2012. Picture taken August 14, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed

WASHINGTON | Tue Jun 25, 2013 4:57pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Food and Drug Administration said on Tuesday it would allow two new cigarettes from Lorillard Inc onto the market, marking the first time the agency has exercised its power to regulate tobacco products.

The FDA, which got that authority in 2009, authorized the company to sell Newport Non-Menthol Gold Box 100s and Newport Non-Menthol Gold Box after it showed they were no more dangerous than products it already sold.

Lorillard's shares rose as much as 4.9 percent before dropping back. They closed up 0.3 percent at $43.53.

"The FDA actions are a very positive development for the tobacco sector, in our view," said Bonnie Herzog, an analyst at Wells Fargo Securities, who noted that the lack of action on the part of the FDA for so long had weighed on the industry. "Now that a potential precedent has been set," she said, "we believe future actions may occur more quickly."

The FDA, for its part, hailed its rulings as "historic," saying it is the only regulatory agency in the world that has the authority to scientifically review and determine whether a tobacco product should be allowed on the market.

The agency stressed that its decision to approve Lorillard's products "is not a finding that the product is safe or safer than its predicate product, or less harmful in general," and it said companies are not allowed to say their products are approved by the FDA.

Under the law, a company must receive premarket authorization from the FDA before it can sell a new product. The product must be shown to be appropriate for the protection of public health. No tobacco company to date has filed such an application.

A less daunting path to authorization exists if a company can show that its new product is substantially equivalent to one it was selling between February 15, 2007 and March 22, 2011 - known as a predicate product. It could also win authorization if it can show that its new product is less dangerous than existing products.

The FDA is currently reviewing some 4,000 applications. About 3,500 are for products that the agency has authorized on a provisional basis and are currently on the market. The remainder are for new products. The agency will decide whether products it authorized provisionally should remain on the market, and it will decide whether to authorize the new products.

Lorillard said it is "proud" to be the first company to receive authorization of a new product.

"We believe that the FDA has carried out its evaluation process in a deliberate manner reflecting sound science," Lorillard said in a statement. "We look forward to continuing productive engagement with the agency moving forward."

FLAGSHIP BRAND

Newport is Lorillard's flagship line, the second-largest brand in the industry, the company said, adding that it believes the addition of the new products to its line-up will strengthen its competitive position.

The FDA said that in addition to authorizing Lorillard's products, it also rejected four from companies it declined to name, saying they had not proved their products were substantially equivalent to marketed products.

Under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act of 2009, the FDA was given the authority to regulate cigarettes, cigarette tobacco and roll-your-own tobacco but not, immediately, pipe tobacco, cigars or e-cigarettes. The law gives the FDA the potential to expand its authority to all tobacco products but it must first issue new regulations. Those are currently in development and the agency declined to say when they are expected to be complete.

(Reporting by Toni Clarke in Washington; Editing by Jeffrey Benkoe and Cynthia Osterman)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (10)
BlakeC wrote:
Marijuana has less toxins than cigarettes, is not addictive yet it’s illegal? The only way to stop people from smoking is to ban cigarettes and if people still want to smoke, let them grow their own tobacco. Quitting for one is the same as quitting to all. You have to go through the withdrawal process whether you like it or not. If suicide is illegal, how come smoking is legal when we know it kills people? We could have an entire country of non-smokers if the FDA would do their job and protect the public, not cigarette manufactures. Might as well put lead back into paint.

Jun 25, 2013 1:40pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
jway87 wrote:
“while they are not safe, they are no worse than products already being sold”

Well, if that’s the criteria for legalization then let’s see marijuana be legalized like alcohol and tobacco.

Marijuana is significantly safer and less addictive than either alcohol or tobacco and there’s NO reason for our government to continue to arrest hundreds of thousands of people every year for choosing a product that is far safer than these cigarettes they’ve legalized today. Tobacco kills 400,000 people every year in the U.S. while marijuana kills NONE.

Jun 25, 2013 2:36pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
txnicole wrote:
They could have solved this without demonizing cigarettes simply by making it illegal to put all the chemical additives that are linked to the cancer in the cigarettes. People have been smoking tobacco for much much longer than any commercial company has been producing it with tons of chemical byproduct in it.

I agree with BlackeC, marijuana is safer — up until the point where we make it legal and some giant corporation creates a monopoly on it and starts thinning it out with filler junk toxins and adding chemicals to it to make it more addictive.

I tend to think that if people are actually concerned about the ‘health’ of people they might start with their national drunken past time and increase taxes on alcohol. You don’t see someone smoke a half dozen cigarettes then be unable to drive a car and kill someone on the road or go home and beat their wife and kids.

Jun 25, 2013 2:46pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.