Factbox: Scenarios for immigration legislation

WASHINGTON Thu Jun 27, 2013 6:05pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The debate over how best to fix U.S. immigration laws has been raging for months in Washington after President Barack Obama made the issue a 2013 legislative priority.

Prospects of a bill being enacted this year also got a boost when Republican Party leaders looked at the results of last November's elections and saw that their failed presidential candidate, Mitt Romney, won less than 30 percent of the Hispanic-American vote.

Embracing comprehensive immigration reform would give more Hispanics reason to at least consider Republican candidates, the Republican National Committee concluded.

Despite all this, House Speaker John Boehner has said a comprehensive immigration measure passed by the Senate Thursday will not be considered in the Republican-dominated House.

Still, things could change. Here are some scenarios laying out what could happen next in the immigration debate:


* The wide-ranging bill that passed the Democratic-held Senate on Thursday, by a 62-38 vote, gets temporarily set aside by the Republican-controlled House of Representatives.

* This summer or fall, the House debates one or more narrow immigration bills. The most likely would be one that tries to stop all illegal immigration over the U.S. border with Mexico.

Other possibilities are a bill that provides more visas for foreign high-tech workers or one that helps American farmers get more cheap labor from abroad. None of these bills puts 11 million illegal immigrants on a pathway to citizenship, as the Senate bill does.

* Once the Senate and House have passed their respective bills, the two chambers appoint negotiators to work out a compromise - one bill that could pass both houses. The negotiators are called conferees and they meet in conference to hammer out a deal.

* The deal they work out is sent to the House and Senate where each chamber votes to pass the same bill that then would go to Obama for signing into law.

* The danger - one that Republican and Democratic aides say is likely - is that the conference deadlocks over the pathway to citizenship and the whole process collapses.


* The House simply takes up the Senate-passed bill. Boehner already has ruled out this possibility because the majority of his Republicans oppose the Senate bill.

But some Democrats still harbor hopes that so much pressure will be thrust on the House in coming weeks and months to pass a comprehensive bill, one with the pathway to citizenship, that it will be forced to act on the Senate bill.

Obama no doubt will try to whip up support, as will immigration advocacy groups who are planning high-profile demonstrations and other lobbying efforts.

* The House relents and takes up the Senate bill.

* But it likely would amend it and send it back to the Senate to pass in its latest form.

* This process could continue with different versions flying back and forth between the House and Senate, like a ping pong game.

* Again, the danger is that each side ultimately sticks to its guns and the whole process collapses.

* Conversely, at some point, Boehner tells his rank and file that he has done all he can do to moderate the Senate bill and for the good of the party and the country, it is time to cut a deal. Some Congress-watchers say this is dangerous territory for Boehner. He could end up backing an historic bill that passes with the support of most Democrats and only a minority of Republicans. And that, some speculate, could put Boehner's job in jeopardy.


* The Senate passes a bill.

* The House passes a much different bill or does nothing.

* Everybody agrees the two sides cannot work out a compromise and each side blames the other for failure.

* Immigration becomes nothing more than a political fundraising tool in the run-up to the 2014 congressional elections and 2016 presidential elections.

This already has begun.

Republican Representative Steve King, a Tea Party favorite from Iowa, made a fundraising appeal on Thursday in which he tried to cash in on his opposition to the Senate bill.

Calling the proposed pathway to citizenship "amnesty," King wrote, "Show the Senate, House leaders, and amnesty activists we won't stand for it by helping me raise $50,000 by midnight on June 30."


Democratic strategist are looking ahead to the 2014 congressional election as a possible fall-back position.

If House Republicans refuse to pass comprehensive immigration reform, Democrats could run on the issue next year.

Democrats would target Hispanic and young voters to drum up support, possibly winning back control of the House.

"We could then pass immigration reform in 2015," said a senior Democrat aide.

(Additional reporting by Thomas Ferraro; Editing by Fred Barbash, Mary Milliken and Bill Trott)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
actnow wrote:
Join the fight to protect U.S. citizens and save our nations future. Numbersusa is a website that helps citizens promote immigration policies that protect workers, tax payers, and our democracy through the effective and simple use of the legislative process. It easy and effictive but we need your help to win this epic battle. Join us and pass it on. Only action counts!

Jun 28, 2013 10:14am EDT  --  Report as abuse
AdamSmith wrote:
VIOLENT DESTRUCTION of the American middle class.

Big money controls Congress and the President. Immigration drives down wages and increases demand, rents and profits.

Mass immigration is an ACT OF SUPREME VIOLENCE against the American middle class.

What is happening in America? More and more mass unemployment. Not enough jobs. More and more layoffs. Yet the wealthy want to drive wage rates down even further.

There is a huge supply of American citizen labor in the USA that cannot find work.

Yet immigration into America from the fast-breeding impoverished slums of Mexico, India, China, Philippines, Pakistan, Indonesia and Africa is accelerating sharply. Immigration into America has never been higher, people arriving by discount airline flights, buses, on foot, by boat.

Why does America even have a military? We are allowing every impoverished, over-populated, fast-breeding nation in the world to invade us by the millions? This is a larger invasion than when Hitler invaded Poland, France and Russia combined, and just as damaging.

The American middle class is being destroyed by immigration.

Immigration on such a vast scale is a supremely violent act against the American middle class.

America needs a NATIONALIST leader who will fight fire with fire.

Jun 29, 2013 9:44am EDT  --  Report as abuse
wigglwagon wrote:
Anyone who cannot show proof of legal residence should be required to cease and desist from their alleged crimes. Embezzlers are not allowed to remain on the job and continue their previous activities. Why are illegal workers allowed to remain on the job while awaiting their day in court?

Jun 29, 2013 11:04am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.