Monsanto unapproved GMO wheat stored in Colorado through '11

Fri Jun 28, 2013 11:17am EDT

Related Topics

(Reuters) - Monsanto Co's unapproved, experimental genetically engineered wheat, which is feared to have potentially contaminated U.S. wheat supplies after it was found growing in an Oregon field this spring, was kept in a U.S. government storage facility until at least late 2011, according to documents obtained by Reuters.

The revelation that the seed for the controversial genetically engineered wheat was kept viable in a Colorado storage facility as recently as a year and a half ago comes as the U.S. government is investigating how the strain of experimental wheat wound up growing in an Oregon field this spring.

The probe by the U.S. Department of Agriculture includes an examination of the handling of the GMO wheat seed that Monsanto directed be sent to the government-controlled National Center for Genetic Resources Preservation in Fort Collins, Colorado, beginning in late 2004, according to Peter Bretting, who oversees the center for the USDA's Agricultural Research Service.

David Dierig, research leader at the National Center for Genetic Resources Preservation, also said the matter was "under active investigation."

The National Center uses high-tech methods to extend the viability of seeds for decades, much longer than their viability in conventional storage. The facility took in at least 43 physical containers of Monsanto's so-called "Roundup Ready" wheat in late 2004 and early 2005, the documents show. The material represented more than 1,000 different unique varieties or lines, according to the documents that Monsanto provided in a heavily redacted format.

The documents were made up of correspondence between Monsanto and the Colorado facility.

Monsanto was shutting down its work with Roundup Ready wheat, altered to tolerate treatments of Roundup herbicide, when it set up a contract dated November 2, 2004, for the resources preservation center to store its wheat seed. Monsanto said the seed was confirmed incinerated on January 5, 2012.

"At our direction, the seed was destroyed ... as it was old material and we had no plans for its future use," said Monsanto spokesman Thomas Helscher, who provided Reuters with the supporting documents. Monsanto also archived some of the wheat at its facilities in St. Louis, Missouri.

When asked if USDA had accounted for all the supplies sent to the Colorado facility, USDA spokesman Ed Curlett said the government probe is seeking an answer to that question.

A USDA spokesman on Friday said the government does believe that all the seed it received was incinerated, and that it cannot account for seed that might have been sent elsewhere.

The Roundup Ready wheat was never approved for commercial use and was supposed to be tightly controlled. Monsanto has said it suspects someone covertly obtained its wheat seed and planted it in the Oregon field to sabotage Monsanto's work with biotech crops.

The government and Monsanto have said there is no indication the GMO wheat made it into commercial supplies, but the finding has hit Monsanto and the wheat industry hard.

Monsanto has been named in several lawsuits and over the last month, exports of U.S. western white wheat have been curtailed as foreign buyers shun the U.S. supplies and demand assurances that none of the biotech wheat has contaminated the marketplace.

Wheat growers want the mystery solved.

"Determining how it happened would certainly make it easier for us to make sure ... that it doesn't happen again, regardless of whether it was sabotage or some accident," said Blake Rowe, chief executive of the Oregon Wheat Commission. "Our customers would like to know how it happened."

(Reporting By Carey Gillam; Editing by Chris Reese and Jim Marshall)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
afisher wrote:
The unanswered question is why did Monsanto receive authorization to even store these seeds in the first place. Didn’t Monsanto originally say that all the seeds were destroyed and now – oops, it was given a whole lot of lee-way by the GWB admin to store these seeds.
The only thing that we can postulate is that opening up these stored seeds and magically when they were being “destroyed” – some of those (snarky) seeds escaped.

Jun 28, 2013 10:26am EDT  --  Report as abuse
sdsavage wrote:
As familiar as you are with this story, why to you always have to cast it in such ominous terms?

“which is feared to have potentially contaminated U.S. wheat supplies”

“The Roundup Ready wheat was never approved for commercial use”

I’m sure that sort of tone drives readership, but it does not inform. So far all the evidence suggest that the wheat is not in commercial channels at all. The USDA has been extremely clear that even if it were it presents no health threat, so “contaminated” in an unnecessarily emotive term unless you are doing yellow journalism.

The trait was absolutely on the verge of approval before major importers blackmailed the wheat growers in North America into asking that the process be stopped. So “never approved” is not exactly a fair representation because it implies that there was some issue (which there was not).

If importers hurt our wheat industry because of this incident, I would say that your sort of slanted coverage is a contributing factor.

Jun 28, 2013 8:27pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
BambiB wrote:
Monsanto’s claims are pretty far fetched. We’re talking about a company that sells seed to farmers which, when used as directed, pollutes the field of adjacent farmers. When those farmers try to use their OWN SEED the next year, Monsanto sues them for using the genetic material from the Monsanto seed.

I wouldn’t be surprised if Monsanto planted the wheat hoping the genetic material would spread and they could claim 1) Damages for use of their genetic material, and, 2) That they are the victims of grain seed being stolen and planted without their knowledge or consent.

They’re doing the second part. Perhaps the genetic material just hadn’t spread far enough for them to make the first claim.

Jul 02, 2013 5:28pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.