Third of conifers under threat of extinction, study says

OSLO, July 2 Mon Jul 1, 2013 8:01pm EDT

Related Topics

OSLO, July 2 (Reuters) - A third of the world's conifers, the biggest and longest-lived organisms on the planet, are at risk of extinction, with logging and disease the main threats, scientists said on Tuesday.

The study of more than 600 types of conifers - trees and shrubs including cedars, cypresses and firs - updates a "Red List" on which almost 21,000 of 70,000 species of animals and plants assessed in recent years are under threat.

"The overall picture is alarming," said Jane Smart, head of the biodiversity conservation group of the IUCN, the International Union for Conservation of Nature, grouping scientists, governments and environmental organisations.

The IUCN said in a report that 34 percent of conifers were at risk of extinction, up from 30 percent in the last assessment in 1998.

California's Monterey Pine, the world's most widely planted pine and prized as a fast-growing source of pulp, was moved to a rating of "endangered" from "least concern" because of threats such as a spread of fungal disease.

Conifers are the largest and longest-lived species on the planet. The Bristlecone Pine can live 5,000 years and the Coast Redwood can grow as high as 110 metres (360 ft).

Craig Hilton-Taylor, manager of the Red List, which is updated twice a year, told Reuters that diseases were compounding existing threats from logging, pollution and forest clearance caused by a rising human population.

And global warming might be making conifers, standing in the same place for hundreds or even thousands of years, vulnerable to new pathogens as temperatures and rainfall patterns changed, he said.

The report said there were some successes. Better management and plantings of disease-resistant stock of Lawson's Cypress in California and Oregon had helped a recovery of trees that were once heavily traded as timber.

Among other findings, scientists added the Santa Cruz Pupfish, which used to live in Arizona, a freshwater shrimp and a lizard known as the Cape Verde Skink to the list of extinct creatures.

"The Skink was last seen in 1916. It's taken a lot of surveys to conclude that it is extinct," Hilton-Taylor said. A total of 799 animals and plants are listed as having died out in the past 500 years or so. (Reporting By Alister Doyle, Environment Correspondent; Editing by Kevin Liffey)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
naildher wrote:
Hmm concern about Paula Dean, Travon Martin and right before peoples eyes the planet we live on dies or is everyone who is alive hopes it only lasts as long as there here?I mean for me yes that is the case i dont have kids lol but we are getting to a point were i wonder will it be fit to live on the world is short on water and the people allow fracking to continue the oceans are in poor condition we continue to pollute them when will people take a look around and get concerned?

Jul 01, 2013 12:30am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Hooks wrote:
People are concern about money. Were in a noahs ark type situation , and our children will pay the price.

Jul 02, 2013 7:43am EDT  --  Report as abuse
TomGenin wrote:
LOL> So there’s been no warming in the last 15 years, but warming is causing them to go extinct?

BTW, the average global temp over the last 570 Million years is a virtual straight line 72F barring the 4 major global freezes. Curiously, as we’re coming out of a 3.5 Million year global freeze, it’s 56F now. So guess what? It’s going to get warmer whether man is here or not, since 56F isn’t even close to “normal.”

Jul 02, 2013 9:08am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.