Russia worried by lack of progress towards Iran nuclear talks

MOSCOW Thu Jul 4, 2013 9:14am EDT

Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov speaks during a news briefing in the main building of Foreign Ministry in Moscow, December 15, 2008. REUTERS/Denis Sinyakov

Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov speaks during a news briefing in the main building of Foreign Ministry in Moscow, December 15, 2008.

Credit: Reuters/Denis Sinyakov

Related Topics

MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russia voiced concern on Thursday that no progress has been made towards organizing new talks between Iran and six world powers on Tehran's nuclear program, despite the election of a relative moderate as Iran's president.

Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said a diplomatic push had been launched to arrange a new round of talks after Hassan Rouhani was elected president on June 14 but made clear there had been no breakthrough.

"There is no agreement now on when and where the next round will be. That worries us," Ryabkov told Interfax news agency.

"After the election of the Iranian president, we stepped up work in preparation for a new round of talks but so far the work is not being done transparently."

The last high-level talks between Iran and the United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany were held in the Kazakh city of Almaty in April.

They failed to end the deadlock in a decade-old dispute over Tehran's nuclear program, prolonging a stand-off that could yet spiral into a new Middle East war. Israel has long hinted at possible air strikes to deny its arch-foe any means to make a nuclear bomb.

At those talks, the six asked Iran to suspend its most sensitive uranium-enrichment work in return for modest relief from international sanctions, an offer Tehran did not accept.

International hopes for a resolution of the nuclear dispute were boosted by the election of Rouhani because he has promised a more conciliatory approach to foreign relations than incumbent President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Iran says it is enriching uranium only to fuel a planned network of nuclear power stations, and for medical purposes.

But refined uranium also provides the fissile material for nuclear bombs if processed further, which the West fears may be Tehran's ultimate goal.

U.S. SETS SIGHTS ON ENDING STANDOFF

A senior U.S. official on Wednesday said that Washington was "determined" to try to resolve the nuclear stand-off with Tehran diplomatically and urged Tehran to return to negotiations.

"The window for such a solution is open and we intend to pursue it," Thomas Countryman, Assistant Secretary for International Security and Non-Proliferation, said.

"We are willing to be optimistic about the possibility of a changed policy in Tehran but it needs to be expressed through actual negotiations and not simply with rhetorical statements."

Tehran's team at nuclear talks with the six world powers has been led by Saeed Jalili, who was a rival election candidate, and is likely to be overhauled once Rouhani takes office in early August.

But Countryman cautioned against hopes that the new president would have the will and the power to shift Iran's nuclear policy.

"When he (Rouhani) does take office, we've got no reason to believe that it changes the fact that the unique authority for the nuclear weapons program in Iran rest with the supreme leader and not with the office of the president."

Iran's theocratic Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei accused the West last week of being inflexible in negotiations and expressed a desire to resolve an issue which has led to ever tighter sanctions on Iran's oil sector and the wider economy.

New U.S. sanctions that came into effect on Monday target trade with Iran's shipping and automobile sectors, gold sales to Iran and handling of the Iranian currency, the rial, a further attempt to force Tehran to curb its nuclear activities.

World powers want Iran to halt its most sensitive enrichment to a fissile concentration of 20 percent and stop work at its underground Fordow plant. Iran refines uranium at Fordow to a level that is relatively close to the threshold needed for nuclear weapons.

(Additional reporting by Fredrik Dahl in Vienna; Editing by Timothy Heritage and Jon Hemming)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
The_Traveler wrote:
Trying to organize further talks with Iran over it’s nuclear program is a total waste of time. They have dodged deadlines, denied access and generally obstructed efforts to come to a multi-party solution at every turn. The Iranian government is playing the world it’s fool.
If their program was “peaceful”, keeping in mind that bringing Islam to the world is considered “peace” in their religious doctrines, then they would have been co-operative long, long ago.

Jul 04, 2013 10:37am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Fromkin wrote:
“When he (Rouhani) does take office, we’ve got no reason to believe that it changes the fact that the unique authority for the nuclear weapons program in Iran rest with the supreme leader and not with the office of the president.”

Is this “Countryman” crazy? Does Iran has a “nuclear weapons program”?

“Thomas Countryman, Assistant Secretary for International Security and Non-Proliferation, said.”

All these “international” think tanks are just shell organizations fronting for Zionists.

Jul 04, 2013 11:23am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Abtin wrote:
I’m sick of all these biased news made by both eastern and western media. Doesn’t Reuters know these sort of things have become cliche.
Doesn’t it know that Iran’s new president will be starting his job on August 3rd.
Iran is the only surviving country in that region where all the other countries have turned into hell and this is of course not in the Western world’s favour.
At least Iran’s nation right now is intelligent enough to understand that if NATO gets there their land turns into somewhere like Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya,….. Ruins everywhere, doesn’t give a damn about the people. Steals its 7,000 years old artefacts and turns it into a trash for disposing their nuclear waste.
But they are wrong 50 millions youths voted and participated in the election to prove the Western governments they care and protect their own land.

Jul 04, 2013 11:26am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.