Wisconsin governor signs into law new abortion restrictions

MILWAUKEE Fri Jul 5, 2013 9:35pm EDT

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker speaks after witnessing a signing memorandum of understanding of the commercial deals between U.S. and China at the U.S. Embassy in Beijing Monday, April 15, 2013. REUTERS/Andy Wong/Pool

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker speaks after witnessing a signing memorandum of understanding of the commercial deals between U.S. and China at the U.S. Embassy in Beijing Monday, April 15, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Andy Wong/Pool

Related Topics

MILWAUKEE (Reuters) - Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker signed into law on Friday new abortion restrictions that opponents said could lead to the closing of two of the state's four abortion clinics.

Opponents of the law, which goes into effect Monday, July 8, filed a federal lawsuit challenging it.

The law requires women to undergo an ultrasound before they get an abortion and doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of their clinics.

"This bill improves a woman's ability to make an informed choice that will protect her physical and mental health now and in the future," said Tom Evenson, a spokesman for the governor.

According to Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin and Affiliated Medical Services, which are the state's two abortion providers, the law could prompt the closing of abortion clinics in Appleton and Milwaukee because doctors there do not have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital.

The two providers filed a lawsuit in Madison federal court on Friday arguing that the law fails to protect the due process and equal protection rights that women who are seeking an abortion have under the Constitution.

Admitting privileges "won't make women safer and, in fact, could jeopardize their health by depriving women in Wisconsin access to safe, high-quality healthcare," said obstetrician-gynecologist Anne Davis in a statement released by Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin.

The law requires an ultrasound be performed on a pregnant woman at least 24 hours before an abortion, a requirement that can be waived if the pregnancy is the result of sexual assault or incest.

Results of the ultrasound including images, a description of the fetus and a visualization of the fetal heartbeat must be offered to the woman. The woman can decline the results.

Anti-abortion activists have turned to enacting new restrictions on abortion at the state level after the Supreme Court's 1973 decision legalizing the procedure nationally in Roe v. Wade.

Wisconsin is the third state this week to move toward more restrictions on abortion after a Texas House committee and the North Carolina Senate both approved measures.

On Monday, the battle in Texas over proposed restrictions on abortion resumes with a public hearing in the Senate, where Democrat Wendy Davis staged a filibuster last month to stall the Republican-backed measure.

Wisconsin is one of eight states requiring a doctor to have admitting privileges, but measures in Mississippi and Alabama are blocked in court, according to data published July 1 by the Guttmacher Institute, a nonprofit organization that supports abortion rights.

Legal challenges are also blocking ultrasound abortion laws in Oklahoma and North Carolina, two of the 12 states with that type of measure in place, the Guttmacher Institute said.

(Reporting By Brendan O'Brien; Editing by Greg McCune, Gary Hill and Philip Barbara)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (32)
gacha wrote:
What this means is moot. But anti-abortion legislators are often men in power and having had friends who went through with abortions, I really think the procedure is traumatic enough without all the moral judgement.

Indeed, the whole purpose of these measures seems to be to further humiliate or put social and moral pressure on women to prevent abortion.

In my humble opinion, going through the procedures called abortion means a woman has already taken a very heavy decision, no need to add to this. Why is it politicians of particular stripes have to make more of a procedure that is already sufficiently stressful?

Is it that they do not believe a woman is morally intelligent enough to make such a decision? Or is it a type of moral cruelty based on personal belief?

Jul 05, 2013 10:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Marcus1000 wrote:
Walker thinks he’s brave. He’s putting himself in harms way for things he neither understands nor believes. Republicans have to stop going against the majorities for their own gain. They are subverting the country. Sooner or later, someone will take sufficient insult to deal one or two of them out. I think they are doing it to provoke a response so they can institute stronger and more restrictive laws. Lets face it, they’re Fascists. In the true definition. Pro-corporaton or people. Anti women. Anti- personal rights. Favoritism for the rich. Suspension of rights altogether for the poor. Corruption and cronyism. All very well documented in the Bush’s administrations. Now Walkers.

Jul 05, 2013 10:14pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
glowbug wrote:
The only problems with that little detail is that she could be raped and have to have the child.
And the reps want to ban contraception!
In case you haven’t realized it yet, they want women barefoot and pregnant and under a mans thumb!
Next they will take away their jobs and then the vote!
If that isn’t clear enough you have no idea what the real world is like and should go back to school or grow up!
Are you 14?

Jul 05, 2013 11:30pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus