Exclusive: Congress delaying U.S. aid to Syrian rebels - sources

WASHINGTON Mon Jul 8, 2013 6:55pm EDT

Free Syrian Army fighters, holding their weapons, stand during military training north of Idlib July 7, 2013. Picture taken July 7, 2013. REUTERS/Abdalghne Karoof

Free Syrian Army fighters, holding their weapons, stand during military training north of Idlib July 7, 2013. Picture taken July 7, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Abdalghne Karoof

Related Topics


Air strikes in Gaza

Our latest photos from the scene.   Slideshow 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Congressional committees are holding up a plan to send U.S. weapons to rebels fighting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad because of fears that such deliveries will not be decisive and the arms might end up in the hands of Islamist militants, five U.S. national security sources said.

Both the Senate and House of Representatives intelligence committees have expressed reservations behind closed doors at the effort by President Barack Obama's administration to support the insurgents by sending them military hardware.

None of the military aid that the United States announced weeks ago has arrived in Syria, according to an official from an Arab country and Syrian opposition sources.

Democrats and Republicans on the committees worry that weapons could reach factions like the Nusra Front, which is one of the most effective rebel groups but has also been labeled by the United States as a front for al Qaeda in Iraq.

Committee members also want to hear more about the administration's overall Syria policy, and about how it believes its arms plan will affect the situation on the ground, where Assad's forces have made recent gains.

Funding that the administration advised the congressional committees it wanted to use to pay for arms deliveries to Assad's opponents has been temporarily frozen, the sources said.

"As noted at the time we announced the expansion of our assistance to the Supreme Military Council, we will continue to consult closely with Congress on these matters," Bernadette Meehan, a spokeswoman for the White House National Security Council, said on Monday.

Technically, the administration does not need specific congressional approval either through public legislation or some kind of legislative sanction process to move ahead with the weapons plan. The president already has legal authority to order such shipments, several sources said.

However, under tacit rules observed by the executive branch and Congress on intelligence matters, administrations will not move ahead with programs like weapons deliveries to the Syrian opposition if one or both of the congressional intelligence committees express serious objections.


Late last month, Secretary of State John Kerry and outgoing CIA Deputy Director Michael Morell briefed the intelligence committees in detail secretly about plans to arm the rebels in response to growing evidence that Assad's forces had used chemical weapons, the sources said.

After that briefing, members of both committees expressed dissatisfaction with the plan, the sources said.

Although initially the House committee voiced greater opposition than its Senate counterpart, after further consideration the Senate panel became concerned enough about the plan to write a letter to the administration raising questions about it, two of the sources said.

At the same time, the appropriations committees of both chambers, which also routinely review secret intelligence or military aid programs, raised doubts.

Syrian opposition sources and officials of governments in the region which support anti-Assad forces have begun to express puzzlement as to why new weapons shipments promised by Washington have not yet begun to arrive.

One Arab government official, speaking on condition of anonymity, expressed concern that the United States had only made the decision to provide weapons but had not yet determined exactly where to send them.

The White House announced in June that it would arm vetted groups of Syrian rebels, after two years of avoiding involvement in the civil war which has killed more than 100,000 people.

The only way the administration's plan will move forward, said the sources, is if congressional committees can work out a deal with the administration to resolve their concerns.

Anti-Assad groups have been calling for more advanced weaponry since the government launched a new offensive in central Syria with the help of the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah. Government forces are hammering the central city of Homs and have encircled rebel strongholds near the capital Damascus.

Over the weekend, the Syrian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood said it felt "abandoned and disappointed" that the United States and Europe had failed to deliver promised military support to the rebels.

A source in Washington who is close to the Syrian rebels also said he knew of no U.S. military aid that had been delivered to them.

(Additional reporting by Susan Cornwell and Steve Holland; Editing by Alistair Bell and Mohammad Zargham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (46)
TheNewWorld wrote:
How dare the Senate and Congress oppose Obama’s dream of arming Al Queda.

Jul 08, 2013 6:25pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
kurdstaat wrote:
The US and Europe have worked have had a strong tie with the Sunni Arabs and Turks against all other nations in the Middle East.
For Example the US brought Saddam Hussein, A Sunni Arab, into power in Iraq and provided him with chemical weapons to commit genocide against the Kurdish nation.
On the other hand the US and Europeans continuestly support the Turks in their acts of genocide and terrorism against the Kurdish nation.
In Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAEA, Qatar, Oman and Yaman the West has made sure that the Sunni Arabs have the power to rule.

Surprisingly this whole strong tie between the West and the Sunni Arabs is not working out in Syria for only one reason. Israel.

Israel does not want the Sunni Arabs to gain control of Syria because they know very well what they are made of. The Sunni Arabs are ruthless, back-warded and want to destroy Israel and United States, so why the hell would they let them take control of Syria right beside Israel, the West’s proxy.
Whats to follow in the coming months is that the Sunnis such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar are going to get more and more frustrated with the situation because they want to arm the rebels to the teeth. The Sunnis Saudis, Qataris and the rest of them have a lot of money and weapons and are at a deadlock with the West that is unwilling to give weapons to their brothers in Syria. This conflict between the West and the Sunni Arabs ruling some States in the Middle East is going to widen because of the situation in Syria. Eventually the Sunni Arabs will start shipping weapons without the permission of the US and the conflict between the West and their only allies, the Sunni Arabs, will intensify as the conflict between the Shiite Arabs and Sunni Arabs intensifies.
The outcome is that the international and inter-State conflict that is unwinding in the State of Syria is going to spread into Iraq as and draw in more and more radicals into the circle of violence.
One the One hand the 3 million Kurds in Syria have gained semi-independence but they have not been recognized internationally. As the Sunni Arabs, the West’s allies, lose the war the Kurds are gaining power in Syria, Iraq, and Turkey. Iran is also getting more powerful by the day and soon they will have Nukes.

The West and their allies, the Sunni Arabs and Turks, are losing clout and control of the situation.
The only solution is that the State of Iraq, Syria, and Turkey has to disintegrate and the world has to recognize the State of Kurdstaan.

Jul 08, 2013 6:39pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
AlkalineState wrote:
Reagan already armed them. That’s how we got to this point. I say we send them a box of grenades without pins and call it good.

Jul 08, 2013 6:40pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.