Regulators probe GM screening test after vehicle fire

DETROIT Tue Jul 9, 2013 8:57am EDT

The 2012 Buick Regal with eAssist fuel-saving technology is introduced at a special Buick event in Chicago, Illinois, February 8, 2011. REUTERS/Steve Fecht/Buick/Handout

The 2012 Buick Regal with eAssist fuel-saving technology is introduced at a special Buick event in Chicago, Illinois, February 8, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Steve Fecht/Buick/Handout

Related Topics

DETROIT (Reuters) - Safety regulators have opened an investigation of some recalled General Motors Co sedans after a vehicle fire in March led them to question a screening test's effectiveness.

The U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said it has opened what it calls a recall query to look at whether a stress test GM is using on a portion of the recalled cars is good enough, because the fire occurred after the procedure that was meant to catch the problem.

In May, GM recalled 42,904 2012 and 2013 model Buick LaCrosse and Regal cars, and 2013 model Chevrolet Malibu Eco cars equipped with its "eAssist" mild hybrid system to repair circuit boards that may overheat and lead to a loss of battery charge or, in extreme cases, a fire in the trunk.

Overheating of the circuit boards in the generator control module in some of the vehicles may cause problems, including loss of battery charge and the illumination of a malfunction indicator light. The issue does not involve the eAssist battery.

If the warnings are ignored, the engine may stall. There may also be a burning or melting odor.

Of the recalled cars, about 22,000 are getting their battery packs replaced, while the rest undergo the screening test to see if the control module needs to be replaced, GM said. A spokesman said the recall is continuing and the automaker is cooperating with NHTSA in its probe.

The spokesman said GM remains unaware of any injuries or crashes related to the issue and he pointed out that changes in the production process at the plant were made and no other vehicles are affected.

NHTSA questioned the effectiveness of the screening test because the fire in March occurred in a car that had already gone through the testing as part of a service procedure before the recall. That same test is being used on almost half the cars in the recall.

Regulators said in documents filed online that the fire drew "into question whether or not the procedure can effectively identify a defective (control module)."

The recall query could lead NHTSA to ask GM to replace the control module in the recalled cars that underwent the stress test.

(Reporting by Ben Klayman in Detroit; Editing by Maureen Bavdek)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
WhyMeLord wrote:
GM, and all other auto makers for that matter, design their tests to yield the results they desire. It’s a given within the industry to balance risks vs. rewards of any mandated corrective action while continuing to increase their stockholder’s equity. In the final analysis, maintaining the bottom line at or above expectations is the criteria upon which an engineer’s worth to the company is bases, not their engineering expertise. This is a fact, I worked for them.

Jul 09, 2013 11:32am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.