North Carolina Republican governor threatens veto of abortion curbs

Wed Jul 10, 2013 1:49pm EDT

Related Topics

(Reuters) - North Carolina Governor Pat McCrory said on Wednesday that he would veto a proposal from fellow Republicans in the state legislature that would tighten regulations on abortion clinics, an unusual move that may kill the proposal for this session.

Republicans tend to be anti-abortion, and Democrats tend to favor abortion rights.

In his statement, McCrory told North Carolina lawmakers that any abortion measures must be drafted so they "are clearly to protect the health and the safety of women."

The legislation McCrory threatened to veto would require abortion clinics in North Carolina to adhere to the same safety standards as centers that do surgery. It also would require a doctor to be present when a woman is given RU-486, a pill to end a pregnancy.

Republicans across the United States have championed similar measures.

If North Carolina lawmakers do not pass the abortion measures this session, which may end as early as next week, they will have to wait until next year to try again.

The battle over the new standards in North Carolina comes as Texas lawmakers work to pass similar legislation this month, sparking protests in both states.

A federal judge on Monday temporarily blocked a law in Wisconsin that would have required doctors performing abortions to have admitting privileges in nearby hospitals. The judge said the law unconstitutionally restricts access to legal abortion while having no medical benefit for women.

In testimony before a state House committee on Tuesday, North Carolina Health and Human Services Secretary Aldona Wos told lawmakers that a better way to protect the safety of women seeking abortions would be to fund more frequent clinic inspections.

Suzanne Buckley, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice North Carolina, which supports the right to abortion, said she was "encouraged" by McCrory's statement but cautioned against too much optimism.

"The fight is far from over," she said.

North Carolina Right to Life, a group that supports the bill, was not immediately available for comment.

(Reporting by Karen Brooks; Editing by Greg McCune and Lisa Von Ahn)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
Obsilutely wrote:
These people are no different than the Taliban. They are forcing their religious agenda on our country through whatever means necessary. These are the same people that bomb abortion clinics and women’s healthcare providers.

Can we just send in SEAL team six or eleven and take them out? Isn’t that their job?

Jul 10, 2013 3:20pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Whipsplash wrote:
“The judge said the law unconstitutionally restricts access to legal abortion while having no medical benefit for women.”
Hopefully all judges will see it this way in all states, and put an end to this madness by these little republican dictators.

Jul 10, 2013 4:42pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
ex-pat wrote:
My god the rest of the world moved on from this issue twenty years ago.
The republicans of the USA are a laughing stock of the world, also seen as very dangerous, stupid and backward people, they really are the Taliban of the USA.
Thank the god of your choice they did not win the presidential election.
If they put in half the effort to secure jobs and healthcare for the citizens of this country as they do with these ridiculous social issues America would be in good shape.

Jul 13, 2013 4:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures