Zimmerman does not testify, as defense rests its case

SANFORD, Florida Wed Jul 10, 2013 6:29pm EDT

1 of 4. George Zimmerman arrives for his trial in Seminole circuit court in Sanford, Florida, July 8, 2013. Zimmerman has been charged with second-degree murder for the 2012 shooting death of Trayvon Martin.

Credit: Reuters/Joe Burbank/Pool

Related Topics

SANFORD, Florida (Reuters) - Lawyers for George Zimmerman rested their case on Wednesday without calling the former neighborhood watch volunteer to testify, setting up the final stages of his closely watched murder trial for the shooting of unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin.

"After consulting with counsel, (I have decided) not to testify, your honor," Zimmerman said in response to questions from Seminole County Judge Debra Nelson.

It was a rare chance to hear Zimmerman speak, as the overweight 29 year old sat emotionless throughout most of the proceedings, smartly dressed in suits and ties bought for him by a supporter.

Jurors were set to begin deliberating on Friday afternoon, after prosecutors delivered closing arguments on Thursday and the defense on Friday morning.

The defense used less than four days of testimony to present its case, while prosecutors spent nine days putting on witnesses.

The defense won generally positive reviews from legal analysts, particularly for its use of well-known forensic pathologist Vincent DiMaio, whose testimony supported Zimmerman's claim he acted in self-defense after suffering at least six blows to the head.

Zimmerman considered Martin, 17, suspicious after spotting him on February 26, 2012, in a gated community in Sanford, Florida, where Martin was a visitor and Zimmerman was the chief neighborhood watch volunteer.

Zimmerman called police and before officers arrived, the two engaged in a confrontation in which Zimmerman drew his Kel Tech 9mm pistol and shot Martin once through the heart.

Zimmerman remained free for more than six weeks after killing Martin because Sanford police initially declined to arrest him, accepting his claim he shot and killed Martin in self-defense.

While civil rights advocates and demonstrators demanded Zimmerman be charged, defenders of liberal gun laws came to his defense, saying Zimmerman was being persecuted for exercising his Second Amendment right to bear arms.

Nine of the 19 defense witnesses said they recognized Zimmerman's voice as that screaming for help on the background of a 911 emergency call, among them Zimmerman's mother and father. Zimmerman, who suffered several head injuries, told police immediately after the shooting he had called for help but no one responded.

Prosecutors had previously called Martin's mother and brother, who testified they believed it was Martin who was heard calling for help.

The screams end upon the sound of a gunshot, and the case might hinge on whom the six-woman jury believes was calling for help.

Curiously, the defense opted against introducing evidence that Martin had a trace amount of marijuana in his system at the time of his death, after fighting hard for the right to admit it. Defense attorney Don West declined to say why.

The shooting in the central Florida town sparked protests and controversy throughout much of last year as it raised questions about racial profiling, guns and bias in U.S. law enforcement.

The Sanford Police Department has put measures in place ahead of the verdict, although Chief Cecil Smith said he is not expecting any violence or even the kind of protests that broke out in Sanford last year and soon spread across the country.

"People are not feeling or hearing anything out there in the community, there's no chatter out there about anything taking place and in some cases there's more of a spin-up on the media side with regards to there being some issues of concern," Smith told Reuters.

Special prosecutor Angela Corey brought the charge of second-degree murder after the public outcry in Sanford, major U.S. cities and other small towns.

Zimmerman, who is white and Hispanic, faces up to life in prison if convicted of second-degree murder. The judge said on Wednesday that prosecutors requested that the jury also consider the lesser offense of manslaughter, with a maximum penalty of 30 years.

Teresa Sopp, a veteran criminal defense lawyer based in Jacksonville, Florida, said prosecutors overreached with a second-degree murder charge and said lead prosecutor Bernie de la Rionda lacked the evidence he needed for a strong case.

"I've never seen Bernie in court with such a mess," said Sopp, who has done battle with de la Rionda many times in the courtroom. "I've never seen him in such straits."

Sopp blamed Corey.

"She always jumps at a case to prosecute ... She overprosecutes everything," Sopp said.

Corey, seated in the front row of the gallery throughout the trial, has declined to comment until after the verdict.

(Additional reporting by Tom Brown and Kevin Gray; Writing by Daniel Trotta; Editing by Steve Orlofsky)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (48)
CircEsAdreim wrote:
[quote]Zimmerman remained free for more than six weeks after killing Martin because police initially declined to arrest him, accepting his claim he shot and killed the 17-year-old in self-defense.

A special prosecutor brought the charge of second-degree murder against Zimmerman after protests and cries of injustice in Sanford, the small Florida city where the incident occurred, and several major U.S. cities.[/quote]

Notice it still doesn’t say police no longer accept his claim of self-defense, but that the charges were brought about BECAUSE of ‘protests and cries’.

So in this case, the mob – motivated by racially charged emotions that the media helped whip into a frenzy – decided who was put on trial, despite plenty of evidence that it was indeed an act of self-defense.


Jul 10, 2013 11:39am EDT  --  Report as abuse
rgrowley wrote:
This news reporting is not logical in saying, “Zimmerman Jury” and “Zimmerman Judge” There is no ownership.
So why do reporters say the judge and jury belong to Zimmerman?

The following reporters are idiots with logical fallacies of generalizations (perhaps racism?): Writing by Tom Brown; Editing by Daniel Trotta and Lisa Von Ahn

Jul 10, 2013 11:40am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Ya know, one interesting aspect of this to me is that, suppose an acquittal occurs (which is of course looking quite likely) – this will have happened withOUT the jury knowing anything about M’s activities and comments about street fighting, running fight clubs, attacking the bus driver and bragging about it, etc. (nor of the stolen jewelry and whatnot). So this carefully-selected (for non-knowledge of the case) and sequestered jury will come to this decision not even knowing that Martin was in fact, pretty clearly a “thug”, or at least a seasoned fighter who liked fighting – which obviously would and does strongly support Z’s version that he was attacked first. So that will make their acquittal verdict that much more compelling. And yet, sadly, I predict that still, it will not be accepted by the good reverends and other racists and race-baiters and assorted nincompoops out there.

Jul 10, 2013 12:06pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.