Cuban food ration system marks 50 years amid controversy

HAVANA Fri Jul 12, 2013 1:31pm EDT

1 of 3. A butcher stands inside a subsidized butcher shop in Havana July 11, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Enrique De La Osa

Related Video

Related Topics

HAVANA (Reuters) - Cuba's food-rationing system marked 50 years on Friday amid controversy, with President Raul Castro facing popular resistance to his plans to end the benefit as he moves the country from broad subsidies of goods and utilities to targeted welfare.

Castro quickly began market-oriented reforms in 2008 after he replaced his ailing brother Fidel, who installed a communist government on the island nation in the early 1960s. But the younger Castro has criticized the rationing system as "paternalistic, irrational and unsustainable."

The country spends 25 billion pesos (around $1 billion) annually on rationing, subsidizing 88 percent of the cost, according to a source close to the government.

The law establishing the system, known as the "libreta," was passed in 1962, and hundreds of ration stores opened on July 12, 1963.

A lifesaver for some and obsolete for others, eliminating rations has proved perhaps the most controversial policy Castro has proposed.

"For many, the ration is necessary because it guarantees each month a little rice, a few eggs, some sugar and milk," said Ignacio Lima, who manages a small, dark and dingy ration outlet in Havana. "It is not enough, but it helps a bit and then you go find what you need on the open market."

After he spoke with a reporter, four shoppers at the store quickly began debating the merits of the system - a discussion much like the one that has raged across the Caribbean island for decades.

Olga Raquel Vazquez, 49, said there had to be a better way to feed people. "The time has come for the ration to disappear," she said.

But Verena Rodriguez, a 72-year-old pensioner at 250 pesos per month, the equivalent of $10 dollars, insisted she couldn't live without her "libreta".

"It has to stay because without the ration some of us will eat and others won't," she said.

"Who has money can buy everything and who doesn't can't," Rodriguez said, adding that with 10 pesos, or around $0.45, she could buy what was coming to her on the ration this week.

A LACK OF CONFIDENCE

Cuba has become a more stratified society since the collapse of its benefactor, the Soviet Union, in the early 1990s. Reforms, such as an opening to international tourism and foreign investment, the loosening of restrictions on small businesses and the welcoming of family remittances, were introduced to manage the economic and social crisis that followed.

As a result of the reforms, small businessmen, farmers, residents with family abroad and others now enjoy an income many times that of state workers and pensioners, yet everyone receives the ration and subsidized utilities.

"Undoubtedly, the ration book and its removal spurred most of the contributions of the participants in the debates, and it is only natural," Castro said in a speech to a Communist Party Congress in 2011, after sponsoring three public discussion on reforming the economy since taking over from his brother.

"Generations of Cubans have spent their lives under this ration system that, despite its harmful egalitarian quality, has for four decades ensured every citizen access to basic food at highly subsidized derisory prices," he said.

Despite communism having its roots in social equality, Castro openly opposes egalitarianism as harmful, saying that people should get what they deserve through individual effort.

The Congress, as part of a five-year plan to institute further market-oriented reforms, voted to do away with the ration, promising it would be replaced by support for poorer Cubans.

But the government, faced with a popular outcry, has instead opted to chip away at the libreta in hopes of gradually weaning the public off it.

Soap, detergent and cigarettes were first removed, followed by potatoes, chickpeas and sugar. This month, the government cut in half its monthly offer of 10 eggs.

Bert Hoffmann, a Cuba expert at the German Institute of Global and Area Studies in Hamburg, said the resistance to ending the ration revealed a lack of confidence in the government.

"It's only natural that people hang on to the "libreta", nobody likes to give up virtually cost-free provisions if he gets nothing in return," he said.

"And this is where Raul's reforms have failed: Cubans don't trust that the targeted welfare system that the government promises will be better, reliable or work at all."

(Writing and additional reporting by Marc Frank; Editing by Philip Barbara)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
hkrieger wrote:
Cuban bread store-
http://www.efn.org/~hkrieger/cu0506.jpg
from the series, “See See Havana”,
http://www.efn.org/~hkrieger/cuba.htm

Jul 13, 2013 11:48am EDT  --  Report as abuse
SanPa wrote:
The positive of Cuban food rationing is that there is little obesity there, save politicians, whereas the condition is rampant a mere 90 miles away. Fortunately, there is a Republican solution to the US obesity problem … open the borders to imported labor to reduce disposible income of citizens, and concurrently eliminate food stamps, veteran’s benefits, and social security. And by cutting Medicare, those fat cat doctors can get used to beans and franks.

Jul 13, 2013 3:16pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
isaiah4925 wrote:
SanPa,
You’ve drunk too much Communist Kool Aid. Mass Immigration and the destruction of the US healthcare system is a DEMOCRAT INITIATIVE NOT REPUBLICAN. Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who turn light to darkness and darkness to light…

Jul 14, 2013 11:27am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.