Gay marriage foes seek to halt California same-sex weddings

SAN FRANCISCO Fri Jul 12, 2013 3:31pm EDT

A box of cupcakes are seen topped with icons of same-sex couples at City Hall in San Francisco, June 29, 2013. REUTERS/Stephen Lam

A box of cupcakes are seen topped with icons of same-sex couples at City Hall in San Francisco, June 29, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Stephen Lam

U.S. Secret Service provide security for President Barack Obama in Pensacola, Florida, June 15, 2010. REUTERS/Jim Young

Protecting the President

The Secret Service detail surrounding President Obama.  Slideshow 

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - Gay marriage opponents asked the California Supreme Court on Friday to stop same-sex weddings in the state and order that a voter initiative banning the nuptials remain in effect.

California voters passed the wedding ban, known as Proposition 8, in 2008 but a San Francisco federal judge struck down the initiative as unconstitutional. Last month the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that backers of the ban did not have the legal right to appeal.

A federal appeals court then allowed gay marriages to resume, and a wave of ceremonies around the state began immediately. Same-sex marriage currently is permitted in 13 states and Washington D.C., and gay rights advocates believe momentum is on their side to extend it further.

In court papers filed on Friday, however, the pro-Prop. 8 group Protectmarriage.com asked the California Supreme Court to immediately tell county clerks that Prop. 8 remains in effect and order them to stop issuing wedding licenses.

California Attorney General Kamala Harris opined last month that clerks should issue wedding licenses. A spokesman for her office could not immediately comment on the court filing on Friday.

Theodore Olson, who represented the gay couples that challenged Prop. 8 in court, called the latest court filing "a desperate and frivolous act."

Protectmarriage.com attorneys wrote in their brief that the injunction against Prop. 8 only applies to the two couples who were plaintiffs in the federal litigation, not to the state as a whole.

"Because those plaintiffs have recently been married, all relief due under that injunction has already been provided," they wrote, "and therefore none of the county clerks are required by that injunction to stop enforcing Proposition 8 in the future."

However, Olson said clerks are bound to issue the licenses.

"Any county that defies the federal court's injunction is at risk not only of contempt of court," Olson said in a statement, "but also a lawsuit under the federal civil rights laws for which it would be liable for damages and the plaintiffs' attorneys' fees."

Jim Campbell, legal counsel for Alliance Defending Freedom, which represents Protectmarriage.com, said his group has no current plans to seek to uphold Prop. 8 in any other court. The California Supreme Court's normal schedule for such a proceeding calls for the state to respond in 10 days, Campbell said, but the court could change that timeline.

(Reporting by Dan Levine; Editing by Jim Loney)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (11)
boccabum wrote:
This group should take a lesson from 1st graders and learn to keep out of the personal matters and business of other people. Especially when those matters have no impact on them in any way, shape, or form.

Jul 12, 2013 3:07pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Jokay wrote:
This is NOT a democracy if the whiners go to the judicial system even after the public votes on it.

Jul 12, 2013 3:26pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Just another right-wing conservative group meddling in other people’s business. The amazing thing is how Conservatives can talk out of one side of their mouths, whining about over-regulation and big government, and then just as loudly moan and complain out of the other side about getting government to legislate the most personal and intimate aspects of a person’s life.

how exactly does gay marriage impact the sanctity of marriage for anyone?

fact: the divorce rate is higher among straight couples – and not just a little. gays stay married about 75% of the time, straight marriages end in divorce over half of the time.

the conservatives in america are the dumbest, whiniest, laziest, most selfish, ignorant, worthless people on the planet. they are holding the world back.

Jul 12, 2013 3:27pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Retirement Road Map