Secret court sides with Yahoo, orders U.S. to declassify Prism surveillance ruling

SAN FRANCISCO Tue Jul 16, 2013 7:59pm EDT

Related Topics

SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A secret U.S. court overseeing government domestic surveillance activities has sided with Yahoo Inc and ordered the Obama administration to declassify and publish a 2008 court decision justifying Prism, the data collection program revealed last month by former security contractor Edward Snowden.

The ruling could offer a rare glimpse into how the government has legally justified its spy agencies' data collection programs under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

Judge Reggie Walton of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court issued Monday's ruling. The government is expected to decide by August 26 which parts of the 2008 opinion may be published, according to a separate court filing by the Justice Department.

Controversial U.S. data collection activities are overseen by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and its appeals body, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review. Both have been shrouded in secrecy since their creation more than three decades ago.

The 2008 ruling stemmed from Yahoo's challenge of the legality of broad, warrantless surveillance programs like Prism.

In June, after Snowden leaked information about Prism to the Washington Post and the Guardian newspapers, Yahoo's lawyers asked the courts and government to declassify and publish decisions upholding the constitutionality of the program.

Legal experts who follow surveillance cases said the 2008 ruling may not reveal any strikingly novel legal reasoning by the government or the courts. But civil liberties advocates said the significance of the ruling may lie in the court's decision itself to declassify the previously secret 2008 ruling.

"Unless the public knows what the laws mean, it can't really assess how much power (it has) given its government," said Patrick Toomey, a national security fellow at the American Civil Liberties Union.

Monday's ruling "is a suggestion that the FISA court is primed now to consider the government's assertion of the necessity of secrecy," Toomey said. "It's a promising first step."

The decision is also a victory for Yahoo Inc, which said in a statement on Tuesday that it was "very pleased" with the court's ruling.

"Once those documents are made public, we believe they will contribute constructively to the ongoing public discussion around online privacy," Yahoo said.

Other Internet companies, including Google Inc and Facebook Inc, began participating in Prism in early 2009 soon after Yahoo lost its appeal before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review.

It is not known if Yahoo, or any other party, has sought to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.

A number of major U.S. Internet companies, including Microsoft, Google and Facebook have asked the government for permission to disclose the number of national security-related user data requests they receive.

On Tuesday, Microsoft published an lengthy letter to U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder asking for greater freedom to publicly discuss how it turns over user information to the government. The letter was a response to a Guardian report that said Microsoft had given authorities the ability to circumvent encryption of Outlook emails and to capture Skype online chats. Microsoft has contested the report, saying it has "significant inaccuracies.

Until recent weeks, Yahoo was prohibited from discussing its activities in the secret courts or even acknowledging the existence of its legal challenge.

The decision to release the 2008 ruling comes as Snowden remained at a Moscow airport, awaiting political asylum. On Tuesday, he applied for asylum in Russia.

In the coming weeks, the government is expected to publish the lower FISA court's 2008 ruling in the Yahoo case and legal briefs related to it. In an uncommon move, the U.S. had previously agreed to declassify a heavily redacted version of the appeals court ruling in the case.

The government has long argued on the grounds of national security that the surveillance courts' proceedings must be secret. Public and political reaction to Snowden's revelations has put pressure on that position.

In June, Senators Jeff Merkley, a Democrat from Oregon, and Mike Lee, a Utah Republican, introduced a bill that would require the government to declassify significant court rulings concerning the FISA court and its supervision of secret wiretapping programs.

"Americans deserve to know how much information about their private communications the government believes it's allowed to take under the law," Merkley said.

(Reporting by Gerry Shih; Editing by Peter Henderson, Toni Reinhold)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
SKYDRIFTER wrote:
The term FISA “court” is a mind-boggling misnomer.

A “court” decides contested issues. The FISA “court” is a simple yes-no “agency;” essentially an editor’s desk. There is no significant reported number of refusals by the FISA “court.” There is no available “court record;” if the ‘secret’ elements of the ‘government’ can have their way.

But, the effect of the psycho-babble leaves the typical person with the illusion that there is some kind of ‘justice’ being conducted or decided in the FISA “court.” Not a chance!

The hardened reality is that the ‘terrorists,’ which the American public has been conditioned to fear, don’t communicate in the ‘regular’ fashion of decent Americans. ‘Terrorists’ use alternate internet services, encryption technologies and unique communication protocols – far from those used by the American public. While not easy to intercept and decipher, the ‘terrorist’ messages are unique.

These “prism” style operations target the true “American” public – exclusively. Whether the ‘data’ is stored or actively used, these “Echelon” or Prism” operations are the stuff of tyranny.

If these operations excluded all but obviously encrypted messages; no one would care; but that’s not how these operations work.

Yes, there may be a lot of wannabe ‘terrorists;’ who may or may not be stupid – using the ‘regular’ Internet. The same is true of ordinary criminals; of all kinds. That breed also uses snail-mail, public roads, bus & trains systems.

We don’t need no stinkin’ Gestapo check-points on every street corner.

In any case, no ‘terrorist’ group has done as much harm to “America” as our own government. That’s not getting any better!

Jul 16, 2013 7:07pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
UScitizentoo wrote:
> Americans deserve to know how much information about their private
> communications the government believes it’s allowed to take under
> the law
The answer is NONE if you are simply trolling for information, per THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION AGAINST UNREASONABLE SEARCH.
DUH.

Jul 16, 2013 7:31pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.