Bernanke sees need for backstop for mortgage market

WASHINGTON Thu Jul 18, 2013 2:30pm EDT

Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke testifies before a Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee hearing on ''The Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress'' on Capitol Hill in Washington July 18, 2013. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke testifies before a Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee hearing on ''The Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress'' on Capitol Hill in Washington July 18, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

Related Topics

Photo

Who's at Sun Valley?

Media and tech giants converge on Allen & Co's annual gathering.  Slideshow 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke weighed into the contentious debate over the future of the housing finance system on Thursday, saying some sort of backstop for mortgages was needed to protect the financial system in times of stress.

However, he stopped short of explicitly endorsing a government role, which many Democrats see as the best approach.

"I think a key issue is going to be ... making sure that there is some kind of backstop or protection for situations where the financial markets are in distress," Bernanke told the Senate Banking Committee.

A bipartisan group of senators has proposed winding down government-controlled mortgage financiers Fannie Mae (FNMA.OB) and Freddie Mac (FMCC.OB) over five years as part of an effort to reduce taxpayer support for the market.

The two companies, which were seized by the government in 2008 as bad loans threatened their solvency, currently back nearly half of all new U.S. home loans.

To fill the role they have played in ensuring a flow of housing credit in good times and bad, the senators would create a government backstop that would kick in times of stress after private creditors had absorbed large losses.

A separate draft bill unveiled by Republicans in the House would also wind down Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, but it would put much sharper curbs on government guarantees.

Bernanke said that if lawmakers created a system in which the government was offering guarantees, they should ensure that the government is appropriately compensated.

He also said they should make sure that firms that are repackaging mortgages into securities for investors hold enough capital to avoid taxpayers getting stuck with losses.

"I think those would be very helpful if you come to a solution that involves a government role," Bernanke added.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were chartered by Congress to expand mortgage finance but operated as private, profit-making companies. Given the central role they played in the financial system, the government felt compelled to bail them out in 2008 when they almost failed.

They were propped up with $187.5 billion in taxpayer funds, but have since returned to profitability and have paid taxpayers about $132 billion in dividends.

(Reporting by Margaret Chadbourn; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
KraftPaper wrote:
Those are great common sense proposals. Now we’ll wait to c what the weasels in congress do. They’ll never divest themselves of holding the ace. they want to be able to raid the banking system for their personal wealth. So no matter how well devised the plan congress will step on it and figure out a way to get their cronies to make loot.
Fannie et al were a joke. Give private corporations millions in salaried compensation for what is essentially doing the same job as the FDIC does for bank accounts. Enforcement needs some fitness trainers too. But with the finance system using derivatives to run their business there is no way the system can ever be honest. No way.

Jul 24, 2013 6:59am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.