Dallas suburb cannot bar housing to illegal immigrants, court rules

Mon Jul 22, 2013 10:18pm EDT

Related Topics


Under the Iron Dome

Sirens sound as rockets land deep inside Israel.  Slideshow 

(Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Monday rejected a Dallas suburb's controversial law that would have prevented illegal immigrants from renting housing.

In a 9-6 ruling, the 5th U.S. Court of Appeals in New Orleans upheld a lower-court decision to block the ordinance in Farmers Branch, Texas, finding that the law interfered with the federal government's authority over immigration policy.

The law would have required renters in the suburb to register with the city and obtain an occupancy license. The city's building inspector would verify an applicant's immigration status with the federal government, and landlords who rented to unregistered tenants would face criminal fines or face losing their rental licenses.

By creating new criminal offenses and allowing state courts to review a non-citizen's immigration status, the law conflicted with federal law, a majority of the judges concluded, citing a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling on Arizona's immigration laws.

Kris Kobach, a lawyer for Farmers Branch, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Farmers Branch ordinance is one of numerous state and local efforts to crack down on illegal immigration. Arizona in 2010 passed its harsh set of immigration laws, which the Obama administration challenged in court.

The Supreme Court in 2012 upheld the most controversial aspect of Arizona's immigration overhaul, a requirement that police officers check the immigration status of the people they stop. But the court also struck down other provisions of the law, including a requirement that immigrants carry immigration papers at all times.

The Texas case is Villas at Parkside Partners et al v. City of Farmers Branch Texas, 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 10-10751.

(Reporting by Terry Baynes in New York; Editing by Eric Beech)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
nosense2day wrote:
Another case of the federal govt not doing their job. We, the people, need to take back this country and throw out the lazy incompetent idiots in all levels of government.

Jul 23, 2013 7:33am EDT  --  Report as abuse
cato0212 wrote:
If you own real estate to rent or lease, the federal courts now mandate you must aid and abet the perpetrators of a federal crime. How insane is that? You can’t employ them but you must now house them. We feed them, educate them, give them medical care and house them. Without a job how do these things get paid for – oh yeah, tax payers dollars! Under these circumstances why would anyone NOT want to here illegally?

Jul 23, 2013 7:42am EDT  --  Report as abuse
catalyzt wrote:
I don’t understand why people who are here illegally get to have laws to protect them. I agree with nosense2day. Federal government is a joke. Lets press charges against them for stealing money (social security) and mishandling of funds.

Jul 23, 2013 7:52am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.