UPDATE 1-France backs Argentina in court battle with creditors -Telam

Fri Jul 26, 2013 10:50am EDT

Related Topics

BUENOS AIRES, July 26 (Reuters) - France has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review Argentina's case in its decade-old legal battle with holdout creditors, Argentina's state news agency Telam said on Friday, citing unnamed legal sources familiar with the situation.

No comment was immediately available from the Argentine government. The South American country is in a legal fight against holders of defaulted bonds who chose not to go along with restructurings in 2005 and 2010, in which 93 percent of holders accepted returns as low as 25 cents on the dollar.

The holdout creditors are demanding 100 cents on the dollar in a case that may end up before the U.S. Supreme Court, if the court accepts Argentina's petition to hear it.

"The French government has filed an amicus brief in support of Argentina's petition before the Supreme Court," state news agency Telam said.

The Supreme Court is on its summer break and won't decide whether to hear the Argentina case until the fall.

Some governments and the International Monetary Fund have voiced worry that a ruling against Argentina would make it more difficult for other countries to restructure their debt.

Argentina is asking the Supreme Court to void an October 2012 ruling by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York, which found it had violated a clause in its bond documents requiring it to treat all creditors equally.

The appeals court has not yet ruled on whether to require Argentina to pay the holdouts. A ruling in their favor would put Argentina on the hook for more than $1.3 billion in payments and risk of another default.

Argentina says it will not give the holdouts - characterized as "vultures" by the President Cristina Fernandez for picking over the bones of the country's 2002 sovereign default - better terms than those offered in the two restructurings.

An adverse court decision would raise the threat of another default because it might complicate payment of restructured bonds if the government continues to refuse to pay the holdouts.

IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde had planned to recommend that the IMF's board approve a friend-of-court brief in support of the case by the end of this week. Argentine bond prices dropped on Wednesday when the Fund announced it would not make the filing.

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Spammfilter wrote:
Amazing, lend the country money, but only vultures would expect the money to be returned. Even the creditors would took earlier settlements should be re-paid their due.

Jul 26, 2013 1:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
8hotsauce wrote:
This is the first case I’ve ever heard of where the bondholders are not only demanding special treatment, but they’re even trying to bully the courts to stop payments to the 93% of bondholders who DID accept the 2005 and 2010 swaps. Nor do they mind jeopardizing the sovereign bond market as a whole (possibly other bond markets as well) by creating dangerous precedent for special treatment. Suffice it to say that if they get their way, the other bondholders will also sue – and Argentina, which has been honoring these bonds since 2005, would be forced to default.

The lead vulture, Romney bundler Paul Singer, is in fact trying to force Argentina to default TO COLLECT INSURANCE; mind you, NML is a Caymans-based laundry which somehow netted $1.3 billion from TARP. Bondholders that did accept the swaps took a 70% ‘haircut’ – but their Argentine bonds more than doubled in value since 2005.

Jul 29, 2013 8:34pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.