American held in North Korea tells family his health is failing

SEATTLE Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:43pm EDT

SEATTLE (Reuters) - Letters sent home by Kenneth Bae, a U.S. citizen imprisoned in North Korea for alleged crimes against the state, show a "new note of desperation," his sister said, as the United States seeks to prevent the Christian missionary from becoming a high-profile diplomatic bargaining chip.

Bae was sentenced in early May to 15 years of hard labor after North Korean authorities convicted him of what it said was an attempt at state subversion. Authorities there said the 44-year-old used his tourism business to form groups to overthrow the government.

Bae has been held since November, and his sentencing came amid acrimonious relations between Pyongyang and Washington over the reclusive state's nuclear aspirations.

"He is asking us directly and saying, 'My health is failing, I need help.' ... There is a new note of desperation," Bae's sister, Terri Chung, told Seattle NBC-affiliate King5 in an interview aired on Thursday.

Chung in the interview said she has received a batch of handwritten letters postmarked from Pyongyang in June from Bae, who suffers from diabetes, which may be causing blindness.

Bae, looking thinner, appeared in an edited interview aired on CNN in early July wearing a dirty, blue-gray prison uniform, and he asked U.S. officials for help securing freedom and asked North Korean officials for forgiveness.

"Please don't lose hope," Chung said she has written in e-mail exchanges brokered by the State Department.

Bae is a naturalized U.S. citizen who was born in South Korea. He most recently lived in China.

North Korea has in the past used the release of high-profile American prisoners as a means of garnering a form of prestige or acceptance, rather than economic gain, portraying visiting dignitaries as paying homage to the country and its leader.

That pattern has complicated the response from U.S. lawmakers and the State Department, which has called for Bae's immediate release on "humanitarian grounds" but resisted sending high-profile envoys to negotiate, as it has done in the past.

"The more public action, the more government attention there is raises the value as a prisoner for Bae," said a Congressional aide familiar with diplomatic efforts, who declined to be named.

An Internet petition urging U.S. President Barack Obama to secure "Special Amnesty" for Bae has garnered roughly 4,000 signatures, and Bae's family plans a prayer vigil in Seattle on August 6. g

(Reporting by Eric Johnson; Editing by Greg McCune and Leslie Adler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
JamVee wrote:
It wasn’t very prudent of this man to engage in a business which subjected him to the irrational whims of the North Korean government.

It doesn’t take a genius to figure out that North Korea might not be “friendly” to: 1) a SOUTH Korean (they are still enemies, who are technically at war); and 2) a former Korean who would be seen as a “defector” for converting to US citizenship (another Enemy). Considering these factors, I question why the US should burn its resources and my tax dollars to rescue a person who quite willingly put themselves in harms way to make a few buck$.

Am I mistaken here?

Jul 26, 2013 8:02pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
euro-yank wrote:
JamVee – beyond the fact that the article leads us to believe he was in North Korea on missionary work vs. business….. I do not believe you are mistaken. Perhaps he felt that his mission from God would save him. As it may not, his supporters and family probably do believe that US tax dollars might.

Jul 29, 2013 3:26pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.