New EPA chief takes on critics of U.S. agency's policies

CAMBRIDGE, Mass./WASHINGTON Tue Jul 30, 2013 4:15pm EDT

Gina McCarthy testifies before a Senate Environment and Public Works Committee hearing on her nomination to be administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency on Capitol Hill in Washington April 11, 2013. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

Gina McCarthy testifies before a Senate Environment and Public Works Committee hearing on her nomination to be administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency on Capitol Hill in Washington April 11, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Joshua Roberts

Related Topics

CAMBRIDGE, Mass./WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Delivering her first speech as the top U.S. environmental steward, Gina McCarthy on Tuesday pre-empted a frequent mantra of critics of the Environmental Protection Agency - that the agency's regulations disrupt the economy and cost jobs.

The benefits derived from rules to address climate change and protect the environment far outweigh their costs, said McCarthy, who was confirmed by the U.S. Senate on July 18 as EPA administrator.

"Can we stop talking about environmental regulations killing jobs, please?" McCarthy said in a speech at Harvard Law School in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

The EPA, often a lightning rod for Republican opposition in Congress, is working to develop "a new mindset about how climate change and environmental protection fits within our national and global economic agenda," McCarthy said.

Embracing the need to cut carbon emissions should be seen not as a threat but as a "way to spark business innovation," she said.

The federal Clean Air Act, the basis of the EPA's powers to set rules, has produced $30 in benefits for every dollar spent in its name, she added.

McCarthy was confirmed after a months-long process that at one point involved a Republican boycott of a committee vote and required her to answer more than 1,000 questions posted by senators about the EPA's rulemaking processes and transparency.

The speech, just a few miles from her hometown of Boston, marked the start of a nationwide tour to talk about why acting on climate change is necessary and to dispel common criticisms.

McCarthy, along with Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz and Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell, is making public appearances to help President Barack Obama roll out the Climate Action Plan he announced in June.

At the heart of Obama's plan will be new EPA regulations that will target carbon emissions from existing power plants, which account for more than one-third of U.S. greenhouse gases and in many cases are fired by coal.

McCarthy said the agency will try to replicate the success it had with the U.S. automotive industry, with which it collaborated to craft new fuel efficiency standards.

"This is a game plan for other sectors to follow on how we can reduce emissions, strengthen energy security and develop new economic benefits for consumers and businesses," McCarthy said.

In addition to close collaboration with industry, McCarthy said she will look to states and local governments that have piloted emission reduction policies and blueprints without waiting for Washington. She said the EPA would not be a leader, but a follower of states' programs to curb emissions, relying on the work they've already put into force.


McCarthy also addressed one of the most controversial environmental and energy issues facing the Obama administration - the proposed Keystone Pipeline project.

Responding to a question about the climate impact of the 830,000 barrel per day pipeline, McCarthy first jokingly pretended to walk away from the podium before responding.

"In all seriousness, I think the best that EPA can do is to be an honest commenter on the environmental impact statement, which we've done our best to do and which we'll continue to do," she said.

An assessment of the project by the EPA released in March raised concerns about the analysis done by the State Department, which found there would be no significant effect on greenhouse gas emissions.

McCarthy said the Obama administration was examining all aspects of the pipeline proposal.

"It is not supposed to be easy," she said. "It is supposed to be hard, it is supposed to be all interests coming together and screaming at the top of their lungs like three crazy children."

(Reporting By Richard Valdmanis; Writing by Valerie Volcovici; Editing by Ros Krasny, Maureen Bavdek and Leslie Adler)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
elsewhere wrote:
When will Americans finally understand that eggheads don’t know the difference in theory and reality? This one is off the deep end like the previous administrator.

Jul 30, 2013 6:41pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
dd606 wrote:
These people won’t be happy until we are driven back into the dark ages, over their insane Co2 nonsense. They don’t want coal, they don’t want nuclear and they don’t want oil… What does that leave? They’ve already closed many coal power plants. Maybe when the rolling blackouts and looting starts, the public will get a clue.

Power plants account for one third greenhouse gasses? How is that possible when like, 96% of what creates the greenhouse effect is water vapor? Only 1/4 of a single percent is estimated to be man made Co2. I mean seriously… Are people really this dumb? Man made Co2 “global warming”, is going to go down as one of the world’s biggest jokes of all time. 100 years from now, they’re going to teach little kids about this in school, and they’ll laugh at us.

Jul 30, 2013 7:37pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus