Japanese minister Aso retracts Nazi comment amid criticism

TOKYO Thu Aug 1, 2013 3:00am EDT

Japan's Finance Minister Taro Aso speaks during a semi-annual parliament hearing on monetary policy at the Lower House of the parliament in Tokyo June 19, 2013 file photo. REUTERS/Issei Kato

Japan's Finance Minister Taro Aso speaks during a semi-annual parliament hearing on monetary policy at the Lower House of the parliament in Tokyo June 19, 2013 file photo.

Credit: Reuters/Issei Kato

Related Topics


Under the Iron Dome

Sirens sound as rockets land deep inside Israel.  Slideshow 

TOKYO (Reuters) - Japanese Deputy Prime Minister Taro Aso retracted on Thursday a comment he had made that referred to Adolf Hitler's rise to power and which was interpreted as praising the Nazi regime.

The outspoken Aso, who is also finance minister and a former prime minister, said he had caused misunderstanding with the comment, which has drawn criticism from a U.S.-based Jewish-rights group and media in South Korea, where bitter memories of Japan's World War Two militarism run deep.

The furor caused by Aso - no stranger to gaffes - and the government's effort to smother the issue highlights the sensitivities facing hawkish Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.

His push to take a less apologetic tone in Japan's diplomacy and his interpretations of wartime history have attracted repeated criticism from countries such as the two Koreas and China, which suffered under harsh Japanese rule before and during the war.

Japan's Asian neighbors are wary of Abe's drive to revise a U.S.-drafted post-war constitution, which renounces war, as part of a more assertive defense and security policy.

Aso was discussing constitutional revision in a speech to a conservative group on Monday when he made the controversial statements.

"Germany's Weimar constitution was changed before anyone realized," Aso said in his typically rambling style, according to accounts in various Japanese media.

"It was altered before anyone was aware. Why don't we learn from that technique?" Aso said. "I don't want us to decide (on the constitution) amid commotion and excitement. We should carry this out after a calm public debate."

South Korean media criticized Aso's remarks, and the Simon Wiesenthal Center asked him to clarify them.

"The only lessons on governance that the world should draw from the Nazi Third Reich is how those in positions of power should not behave," Rabbi Abraham Cooper, associate dean at the centre, said in a statement on the group's website.


China's Foreign Ministry also reacted angrily to the comment, saying Japan needed to "seriously reflect on history".

On Thursday, Aso said he had meant in the speech to seek a calm and in-depth debate on the constitution. He said he wanted to avoid the kind of turmoil that he said helped Hitler change the democratic constitution established by Germany's Weimar government after World War One, under which the dictator had taken power.

"I pointed to the changes to the Weimar constitution made under the Nazi regime as a bad example of changes made without a substantial debate or understanding by the citizens," Aso told reporters.

"I invited misunderstanding as a result and I would like to withdraw the statement in which I cited the Nazi regime as an example," he said.

Aso's retraction followed a discussion with Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga, who sought to put an end to the controversy.

"I want to stress that the Abe administration does not perceive the Nazi Germany in a positive light," Suga told a regular news conference. He said Japan has contributed to global peace and human rights for many years and would continue to do so.

Aso, the scion of a family whose mining company used Korean forced laborers during Japan's 1910-1945 occupation of the Korean peninsula, has talked himself into trouble before.

During his 2008-2009 stint as prime minister, Aso offended a wide swathe of voters with off-the-cuff remarks that included a joke about sufferers of Alzheimer's disease. Before becoming prime minister in 2008, he has offended the main opposition party by apparently likening them to Nazis.

(Editing by William Mallard and Robert Birsel)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
TherapyDog wrote:
The World wants to be sure that those who reference the Nazis nowadays do so inline with Rabbi Abraham Cooper’s comment.

Aug 01, 2013 4:08am EDT  --  Report as abuse
FRPSR wrote:
The culture of the Japanese has few simple quid pro quo’s corresponding to the thinking of comparative complexity in western equals . That the Chinese who more and more intentionally resemble a peculiar trait that is the fashion amongst certain western political movements , is no accident . Adopting a premise of a wartime footing for all issues , especially domestic , and China is aping these for theatrical reasons above ideology . The difficulty in transposing the meaning of idioms in casual conversations to those who speak a cultures native tongue , but lack a natives familiarity , has a strong resemblance to the contretemps sought here . Who can be unaware of the adolescent (deadly) fumbling of China flexing its immature military confidence staring down much smaller nations ? The irony is far from lost on the wise people of China that they are aping the policies of negation directly from a major American political party . Far from being accidental it is an adoption that cooler heads saw inside of a preemption policy going against the natural human inclination to seek a reduction of possible hostilities through diplomatic means . So saying the idea of attacking an enemy by identifying them with key words like terrorist , or weapons of mass destruction , before they could supposedly attack us , fell victim to false narratives supplied by the eager belligerent , and became a favorite adoption of borderline states .
The Korea’s on the other hand are far more honest if equally puzzled by the same cultural difficulties that may be called idiomatic . The sensitivity to the war crimes of imperial Japan may abate in time , but not for the pride of these nations , only for the serious cooperation and work of all involved , or the recently much abused diplomatic means supplied in the “bureaucracies” reports .

Aug 01, 2013 7:58am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.