U.S. sets rules to prevent type of rail crash that hit Quebec town

WASHINGTON Fri Aug 2, 2013 9:19pm EDT

Wagons are pictured on the site of the train wreck in Lac Megantic, July 16, 2013. REUTERS/Ryan Remiorz/Pool

Wagons are pictured on the site of the train wreck in Lac Megantic, July 16, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Ryan Remiorz/Pool

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. rail safety regulator issued rules on Friday meant to prevent the kind of runaway fuel-train accident that devastated a Canadian town last month.

Under the rules, rail cars carrying hazardous materials such as combustibles may not be left unattended on main tracks or adjacent tracks unless specifically authorized.

Railroads must boost their safety procedures and record-keeping for trains that carry hazardous material and are braked, according to the rules from the Federal Railroad Administration.

Last month, a parked train carrying crude oil broke loose and crashed in Lac-Megantic, Quebec, exploding into a fireball that killed 47 people. It was North America's worst rail disaster in two decades.

"Safety is our top priority," U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx said in a statement.

"While we wait for the full investigation (of the Canadian incident) to conclude, the Department is taking steps today to help prevent a similar incident from occurring in the United States."

The Association of American Railroads said it agreed to implement the new rules for hazardous substances, which include crude and ethanol.

The Transportation Safety Board of Canada said on Thursday that its investigation would last for months and that it was too early to draw conclusions.

(Reporting by Patrick Rucker; Editing by Peter Cooney and Mohammad Zargham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
loyalsys wrote:
How about wireless remote monitoring of manually set brakes to confirm that enough of them have been set to hold a train of specified load on a specified grade? And also include wireless monitoring of the state of the locomotive braking system.

Depending on a single engineer to take responsibility for the brakes on an unattended train makes no sense whatever.

Aug 02, 2013 11:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
ChicagoFats wrote:
If you shorten that last sentence a bit you will focus on a large part of the problem: “Depending on a single engineer…makes no sense whatever.” When hazardous materials are involved there need to be more than one set of hands and eyes.

Aug 03, 2013 1:12am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.